[PATCH 2/2] gem_ring_sync_loop: test the new ring

From: "Xiang, Haihao" <haihao.xiang@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gem_ring_sync_loop: test the new ring
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:58:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352966290-25762-2-git-send-email-haihao.xiang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352966290-25762-1-git-send-email-haihao.xiang@intel.com>

From: "Xiang, Haihao" <haihao.xiang@intel.com>

The code is surround by a #ifdef...#endif to avoid to break compiling against
the current libdrm release

Signed-off-by: Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c b/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c
index 2875cf3..955bf34 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c
@@ -81,6 +81,18 @@ get_num_rings(int fd)
 	else
 		goto skip;
 
+#ifdef I915_PARAM_HAS_VEBOX /* remove it once the upstream libdrm support VEBOX */
+
+	gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_VEBOX;
+	ret = drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp);
+
+	if ((ret == 0) & (*gp.value > 0))
+		num_rings++;
+	else
+		goto skip;
+
+#endif
+
 skip:	
 	return num_rings;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5
