From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5 v3] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:46:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432028803-32296-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
Hello,
This is a third version of my patches to fix handling of s[ug]id bits and
capabilities xattrs in VFS. There are a few issues I found:
1) MS_NOSEC handling is broken - we set it after each file_remove_suid() call.
However we needn't have removed suid bit simply because we have
CAP_SYS_FSID and further writes to the file from processes without this
capability still need to clear the suid bit.
2) file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it also handles removing of
security labels. It is even more confusing because should_remove_suid()
doesn't return whether file_remove_suid() is needed or not.
3) On truncate we do clear suid bits but not security labels. According to
documentation in include/linux/security.h that's a bug but please correct
me if I'm wrong.
4) ocfs2 doesn't clear capability xattrs - hard to fix, I left it alone for
now.
5) XFS didn't provide proper exclusion for clearing mode bits.
This series aims at fixing above issues. Al, can you please merge the
patches? Thanks!
Changes since v2:
* Rebased on top of current Linus' tree
* Improved patch 1 to use inode_has_no_xattr() as Linus suggested
Changes since v1:
* Removed bogus patch changing inode_set_flags()
* Updated changelog of patch 4/5 to better explain why ->inode_killpriv
should be called
* Included a fix for MS_NOSEC handling in this series.
Honza
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 9:46 Jan Kara [this message]
2015-05-19 9:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
2015-05-19 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs() Jan Kara
2015-05-19 9:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything Jan Kara
2015-05-19 9:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate Jan Kara
2015-05-19 9:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks Jan Kara
2015-05-19 14:19 ` [PATCH 0/5 v3] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Casey Schaufler
2015-05-19 15:05 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432028803-32296-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.