All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915: Make crtc checking use the atomic state.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:49:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438170585.3839.8.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438000541-3219-7-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 14:35 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Instead of allocating pipe_config on the stack use the old crtc_state,
> it's only going to freed from this point on.
> 
> All crtc's encoders are now only checked once during modeset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index fbb257d4728c..e3afe611a78c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11829,7 +11829,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config =
>  		to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
>  	struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->state;
> -	int ret, idx = crtc->base.id;
> +	int ret;
>  	bool mode_changed = needs_modeset(crtc_state);
>  
>  	if (mode_changed && !check_encoder_cloning(state, intel_crtc)) {
> @@ -11837,10 +11837,6 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	I915_STATE_WARN(crtc->state->active != intel_crtc->active,
> -		"[CRTC:%i] mismatch between state->active(%i) and crtc->active(%i)\n",
> -		idx, crtc->state->active, intel_crtc->active);
> -
>  	if (mode_changed && !crtc_state->active)
>  		intel_crtc->atomic.update_wm_post = true;
>  
> @@ -12721,19 +12717,16 @@ check_encoder_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  	for_each_intel_encoder(dev, encoder) {
>  		bool enabled = false;
> -		bool active = false;
> -		enum pipe pipe, tracked_pipe;
> +		enum pipe pipe;
>  
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s]\n",
>  			      encoder->base.base.id,
>  			      encoder->base.name);
>  
>  		for_each_intel_connector(dev, connector) {
> -			if (connector->base.encoder != &encoder->base)
> +			if (connector->base.state->best_encoder != &encoder->base)
>  				continue;
>  			enabled = true;
> -			if (connector->base.dpms != DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF)
> -				active = true;
>  
>  			I915_STATE_WARN(connector->base.state->crtc !=
>  					encoder->base.crtc,
> @@ -12744,85 +12737,86 @@ check_encoder_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		     "encoder's enabled state mismatch "
>  		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n",
>  		     !!encoder->base.crtc, enabled);
> -		I915_STATE_WARN(active && !encoder->base.crtc,
> -		     "active encoder with no crtc\n");
> -
> -		active = encoder->get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe);
>  
>  		if (!encoder->base.crtc) {
> -			I915_STATE_WARN(active,
> -			     "encoder detached but not turned off.\n");
> +			bool active;
>  
> -			continue;
> +			active = encoder->get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe);
> +			I915_STATE_WARN(active,
> +			     "encoder detached but still enabled on pipe %c.\n",
> +			     pipe_name(pipe));
>  		}
> -
> -		I915_STATE_WARN(active != encoder->base.crtc->state->active,
> -		     "encoder's hw state doesn't match sw tracking "
> -		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n",
> -		     encoder->base.crtc->state->active, active);
> -
> -
> -		tracked_pipe = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc)->pipe;
> -		I915_STATE_WARN(active && pipe != tracked_pipe,
> -		     "active encoder's pipe doesn't match"
> -		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n",
> -		     tracked_pipe, pipe);
> -
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -check_crtc_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> +check_crtc_state(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> -	struct intel_crtc_state pipe_config;
> +	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> +	int i;
>  
> -	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> +	for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {

So now we only check the state of crtcs affected by the modeset. In the
unlikely case of a bug that changes the hw state of another crtc that
should have been unchanged, the old code might catch the issue but the
new one doesn't. Isn't it better to just check everything?


Ander

> +		struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> +		struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config, *sw_config;
>  		bool active;
>  
> -		memset(&pipe_config, 0, sizeof(pipe_config));
> +		if (!needs_modeset(crtc->state))
> +			continue;
>  
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d]\n",
> -			      crtc->base.base.id);
> +		__drm_atomic_helper_crtc_destroy_state(crtc, crtc_state);
> +		pipe_config = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
> +		memset(pipe_config, 0, sizeof(*pipe_config));
> +		crtc_state->crtc = crtc;
> +		crtc_state->state = state;
>  
> -		I915_STATE_WARN(crtc->active && !crtc->base.state->enable,
> -		     "active crtc, but not enabled in sw tracking\n");
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d]\n",
> +			      crtc->base.id);
>  
> -		active = dev_priv->display.get_pipe_config(crtc,
> -							   &pipe_config);
> +		active = dev_priv->display.get_pipe_config(intel_crtc,
> +							   pipe_config);
>  
>  		/* hw state is inconsistent with the pipe quirk */
> -		if ((crtc->pipe == PIPE_A && dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE) ||
> -		    (crtc->pipe == PIPE_B && dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIPEB_FORCE))
> -			active = crtc->active;
> +		if ((intel_crtc->pipe == PIPE_A && dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE) ||
> +		    (intel_crtc->pipe == PIPE_B && dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIPEB_FORCE))
> +			active = crtc->state->active;
>  
> -		for_each_intel_encoder(dev, encoder) {
> -			enum pipe pipe;
> -			if (encoder->base.crtc != &crtc->base)
> -				continue;
> -			if (encoder->get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe))
> -				encoder->get_config(encoder, &pipe_config);
> -		}
> -
> -		I915_STATE_WARN(crtc->active != active,
> +		I915_STATE_WARN(crtc->state->active != active,
>  		     "crtc active state doesn't match with hw state "
> -		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n", crtc->active, active);
> +		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n", crtc->state->active, active);
>  
> -		I915_STATE_WARN(crtc->active != crtc->base.state->active,
> +		I915_STATE_WARN(intel_crtc->active != crtc->state->active,
>  		     "transitional active state does not match atomic hw state "
> -		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n", crtc->base.state->active, crtc->active);
> +		     "(expected %i, found %i)\n", crtc->state->active, intel_crtc->active);
> +
> +		for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, crtc, encoder) {
> +			enum pipe pipe;
> +
> +			active = encoder->get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe);
> +			I915_STATE_WARN(active != crtc->state->active,
> +				"[ENCODER:%i] active %i with crtc active %i\n",
> +				encoder->base.base.id, active, crtc->state->active);
> +
> +			I915_STATE_WARN(active && intel_crtc->pipe != pipe,
> +					"Encoder connected to wrong pipe %c\n",
> +					pipe_name(pipe));
> +
> +			if (active)
> +				encoder->get_config(encoder, pipe_config);
> +		}
>  
> -		if (!active)
> +		if (!crtc->state->active)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(dev, crtc->config,
> -					       &pipe_config, false)) {
> +		sw_config = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> +		if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(dev, sw_config,
> +					       pipe_config, false)) {
>  			I915_STATE_WARN(1, "pipe state doesn't match!\n");
> -			intel_dump_pipe_config(crtc, &pipe_config,
> +			intel_dump_pipe_config(intel_crtc, pipe_config,
>  					       "[hw state]");
> -			intel_dump_pipe_config(crtc, crtc->config,
> +			intel_dump_pipe_config(intel_crtc, sw_config,
>  					       "[sw state]");
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -12884,7 +12878,7 @@ intel_modeset_check_state(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	check_wm_state(dev);
>  	check_connector_state(dev, state);
>  	check_encoder_state(dev);
> -	check_crtc_state(dev);
> +	check_crtc_state(dev, state);
>  	check_shared_dpll_state(dev);
>  }
>  
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-29 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-27 12:35 [PATCH v2 00/12] DPMS updates and atomic state checking Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915: Make the force_thru workaround atomic Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 14:04   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-28  7:57     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-28  8:25       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-28  9:04         ` [PATCH v2.1 01/12] drm/i915: Make the force_thru workaround atomic, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Update atomic state when removing mst connector Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-28 12:13   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-08-03  8:10     ` [PATCH v2.1 2.7/12] drm/i915: Update atomic state when removing mst connector, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06  5:34   ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Update atomic state when removing mst connector Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-06  7:28     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: Convert connector checking to atomic Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-28 13:13   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-28 15:51     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-30 12:57     ` [PATCH v2.1 2.5/12] drm/i915: Validate the state after an atomic modeset, only, and pass the state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-31  9:32       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-30 12:57     ` [PATCH v2.1 03/12] drm/i915: Convert connector checking to atomic, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-31  9:37       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915: Remove some unneeded checks from check_crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-28 13:29   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from state checking Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-28 13:48   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915: Make crtc checking use the atomic state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-29 11:49   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2015-07-29 12:04     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-29 12:31       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-29 12:44         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-30 12:59         ` [PATCH v2.1 06/12] drm/i915: Make crtc checking use the atomic state, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915: Get rid of dpms handling Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-31  9:40   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from sanitization Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-29 13:09   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-30  7:11     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-30 13:00     ` [PATCH v2.1 08/12] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from sanitization, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from intel_dp.c Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-29 13:26   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-30  6:54     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-30  9:16       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-30 13:01         ` [PATCH v2.1 09/12] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from intel_dp.c, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-31  9:41   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915: Only update mode related state if a modeset happened Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-30 12:19   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-07-27 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915: Handle return value in intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-28  8:39   ` shuang.he

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1438170585.3839.8.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.