All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mchristi@redhat.com
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/32] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
Date: Wed,  4 Nov 2015 10:32:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446654807-6935-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> (raw)

There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support
for in the near term:

compare and write
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg07826.html

copy offload/extended copy/xcopy
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-July/msg00070.html

The problem is if we contine to add more commands we will have to one day
extend the cmd_flags/bi_rw fields again. To prevent that, this patchset
separates the operation (REQ_WRITE, REQ_DISCARD, REQ_WRITE_SAME, etc) from
the flags (REQ_SYNC, REQ_QUIET, etc) in the bio and request structs. In the
end of this set, we will have two fields bio->bi_op/request->op and
bio->bi_rw/request->cmd_flags.

The patches were made against Jens's linux-block tree's for-linus branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-linus
(last commit a22c4d7e34402ccdf3414f64c50365436eba7b93).

I have done some basic testing for a lot of the drivers and filesystems,
but I wanted to get comments before trying to track down more hardware/
systems for testing.


Known issues:
- REQ_FLUSH is still a flag, but should probably be a operation.
 For lower level drivers like SCSI where we only get a flush, it makes
more sense to be a operation. However, upper layers like filesystems
can send down flushes with writes, so it is more of a flag for them.
I am still working on this.

- There is a regression with the dm flakey target. It currently
cannot corrupt the operation values.

- The patchset is a little awkward. It touches so much code,
but I wanted to maintain git bisectibility, so there is lots of compat code
left around until the last patches where everyting is cleaned up.

             reply	other threads:[~2015-11-04 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04 16:32 mchristi [this message]
2015-11-04 16:32 ` [PATCH 01/32] block/fs: add REQ_OP definitions mchristi
2015-11-04 16:32 ` [PATCH 02/32] block/fs/mm: prepare submit_bio_wait users for bi_rw split mchristi
2015-11-04 16:32 ` [PATCH 03/32] dio/btrfs: prep dio->submit_bio " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:32 ` [PATCH 04/32] block: prepare blkdev_issue_discard " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:33 ` [PATCH 05/32] drbd: prepare drbd " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:33 ` [PATCH 06/32] xen blkback: prepare " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:33 ` [PATCH 07/32] dm: " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:33 ` [PATCH 08/32] target: " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:33 ` [PATCH 09/32] btrfs: " mchristi
2015-11-04 16:49 ` [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/32] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs Bart Van Assche
2015-11-04 16:49   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-11-04 16:53   ` Mike Christie
     [not found]     ` <563A3813.5010604-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-07 10:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 10:23         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-11  7:53         ` Mike Christie
     [not found]           ` <5642F3F4.2060007-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-11 11:28             ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-11 11:28               ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]               ` <20151111112846.GA358-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-11 17:37                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-11 17:37                   ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1446654807-6935-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com \
    --to=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.