All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] NFS: Be more targeted about readdirplus use when doing lookup/revalidation
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:54:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479574497-38268-3-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479574497-38268-2-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

There is little point in setting NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS in nfs_lookup and
nfs_lookup_revalidate() unless a process is actually doing readdir on the
parent directory.
Furthermore, there is little point in using readdirplus if we're trying
to revalidate a negative dentry.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
 fs/nfs/dir.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index 53e02b8bd9bd..5befd382be7d 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -455,14 +455,23 @@ bool nfs_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir, struct dir_context *ctx)
 }
 
 /*
- * This function is called by the lookup code to request the use of
- * readdirplus to accelerate any future lookups in the same
+ * This function is called by the lookup and getattr code to request the
+ * use of readdirplus to accelerate any future lookups in the same
  * directory.
+ * Do this by checking if there is an active file descriptor
+ * and calling nfs_advise_use_readdirplus, then forcing a
+ * cache flush.
  */
 static
 void nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir)
 {
-	set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_I(dir)->flags);
+	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(dir);
+
+	if (nfs_server_capable(dir, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS) &&
+	    !list_empty(&nfsi->open_files)) {
+		set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &nfsi->flags);
+		invalidate_mapping_pages(dir->i_mapping, 0, -1);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -475,10 +484,7 @@ void nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir)
  */
 void nfs_force_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir)
 {
-	if (!list_empty(&NFS_I(dir)->open_files)) {
-		nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
-		invalidate_mapping_pages(dir->i_mapping, 0, -1);
-	}
+	nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
 }
 
 static
@@ -1150,7 +1156,7 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
 				return -ECHILD;
 			goto out_bad;
 		}
-		goto out_valid_noent;
+		goto out_valid;
 	}
 
 	if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
@@ -1192,6 +1198,9 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
 	if (IS_ERR(label))
 		goto out_error;
 
+	/* We need to force a revalidation: set a readdirplus hint */
+	nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
+
 	trace_nfs_lookup_revalidate_enter(dir, dentry, flags);
 	error = NFS_PROTO(dir)->lookup(dir, &dentry->d_name, fhandle, fattr, label);
 	trace_nfs_lookup_revalidate_exit(dir, dentry, flags, error);
@@ -1211,9 +1220,6 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
 out_set_verifier:
 	nfs_set_verifier(dentry, nfs_save_change_attribute(dir));
  out_valid:
-	/* Success: notify readdir to use READDIRPLUS */
-	nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
- out_valid_noent:
 	if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 		if (parent != ACCESS_ONCE(dentry->d_parent))
 			return -ECHILD;
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-19 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-19 16:54 [PATCH 0/3] Address readdirplus performance Trond Myklebust
2016-11-19 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] NFS: Fix a performance regression in readdir Trond Myklebust
2016-11-19 16:54   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2016-11-19 16:54     ` [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Replace nfs_force_use_readdirplus() with nfs_advise_use_readdirplus() Trond Myklebust
2016-11-30 19:09     ` [PATCH 2/3] NFS: Be more targeted about readdirplus use when doing lookup/revalidation Benjamin Coddington
2016-12-01 20:47       ` Trond Myklebust
2016-12-02 13:56         ` Benjamin Coddington
2016-12-02 14:32           ` Trond Myklebust
2016-11-30 19:08   ` [PATCH 1/3] NFS: Fix a performance regression in readdir Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1479574497-38268-3-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.