All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kevin.wangtao@linaro.org, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/25] thermal/drivers/step_wise: Fix temperature regulation misbehavior
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:02:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507658570-32675-15-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507658570-32675-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the heat
dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC reset.

The behavior is reproducible on a hikey6220 with bad heat dissipation (eg.
stacked with other boards).

Running a simple C program doing while(1); for each CPU of the SoC makes the
temperature to reach the passive regulation trip point and ends up to the
maximum allowed temperature followed by a reset.

This issue has been also reported by running the libhugetlbfs test suite.

What is observed is a ping pong between two cpu frequencies, 1.2GHz and 900MHz
while the temperature continues to grow.

It appears the step wise governor calls get_target_state() the first time with
the throttle set to true and the trend to 'raising'. The code selects logically
the next state, so the cpu frequency decreases from 1.2GHz to 900MHz, so far so
good. The temperature decreases immediately but still stays greater than the
trip point, then get_target_state() is called again, this time with the
throttle set to true *and* the trend to 'dropping'. From there the algorithm
assumes we have to step down the state and the cpu frequency jumps back to
1.2GHz. But the temperature is still higher than the trip point, so
get_target_state() is called with throttle=1 and trend='raising' again, we jump
to 900MHz, then get_target_state() is called with throttle=1 and
trend='dropping', we jump to 1.2GHz, etc ... but the temperature does not
stabilizes and continues to increase.

[  237.922654] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  237.922678] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  237.922690] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[  237.922701] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
[  238.026656] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[  238.026680] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[  238.026694] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[  238.026707] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=0
[  238.134647] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  238.134667] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  238.134679] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[  238.134690] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1

In this situation the temperature continues to increase while the trend is
oscillating between 'dropping' and 'raising'. We need to keep the current state
untouched if the throttle is set, so the temperature can decrease or a higher
state could be selected, thus preventing this oscillation.

Keeping the next_target untouched when 'throttle' is true at 'dropping' time
fixes the issue.

The following traces show the governor does not change the next state if
trend==2 (dropping) and throttle==1.

[ 2306.127987] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2306.128009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2306.128021] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[ 2306.128031] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
[ 2306.231991] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.232016] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.232030] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.232042] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2306.335982] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2306.336006] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2306.336021] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.336034] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2306.439984] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.440008] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=0
[ 2306.440022] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.440034] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=0

[ ... ]

After a while, if the temperature continues to increase, the next state becomes
2 which is 720MHz on the hikey. That results in the temperature stabilizing
around the trip point.

[ 2455.831982] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2455.832006] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=0
[ 2455.832019] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2455.832032] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2455.935985] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2455.936013] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=0
[ 2455.936027] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2455.936040] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2456.043984] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2456.044009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=0
[ 2456.044023] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2456.044036] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2456.148001] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2456.148028] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2456.148042] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2456.148055] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=2
[ 2456.252009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2456.252041] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=0
[ 2456.252058] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=2
[ 2456.252075] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=2, target=1

IOW, this change is needed to keep the state for a cooling device if the
temperature trend is oscillating while the temperature increases slightly.

Without this change, the situation above leads to a catastrophic crash by a
hardware reset on hikey. This issue has been reported to happen on an OMAP
dra7xx also.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
index be95826..ee047ca 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
@@ -31,8 +31,7 @@
  * If the temperature is higher than a trip point,
  *    a. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISING, use higher cooling
  *       state for this trip point
- *    b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, use lower cooling
- *       state for this trip point
+ *    b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, do nothing
  *    c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, use upper limit
  *       for this trip point
  *    d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lower limit
@@ -94,9 +93,11 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
 			if (!throttle)
 				next_target = THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
 		} else {
-			next_target = cur_state - 1;
-			if (next_target > instance->upper)
-				next_target = instance->upper;
+			if (!throttle) {
+				next_target = cur_state - 1;
+				if (next_target > instance->upper)
+					next_target = instance->upper;
+			}
 		}
 		break;
 	case THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL:
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10 18:02 [GIT PULL] thermal: new material for hikey for 4.15 Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02 ` [PATCH 01/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Fix missing interrupt enablement Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 02/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Remove the multiple sensors support Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  3:54     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-17 12:28       ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17 18:25         ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-17 19:03           ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17 21:07             ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-17 21:10               ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-18  1:48               ` Leo Yan
2017-10-18 15:51                 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-18 16:23                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-18  1:49               ` Wangtao (Kevin, Kirin)
2017-10-18  1:49                 ` Wangtao (Kevin, Kirin)
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 03/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Fix kernel panic on alarm interrupt Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 04/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Simplify the temperature/step computation Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 05/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Fix multiple alarm interrupts firing Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 06/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Remove pointless lock Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 07/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Encapsulate register writes into helpers Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 08/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Fix configuration register setting Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  4:22     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 09/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Remove costly sensor inspection Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 10/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Rename and remove unused field Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 11/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Convert long to int Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 12/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Remove thermal data back pointer Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 13/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Remove mutex_lock in the code Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 14/25] thermal/drivers/generic-iio-adc: Switch tz request to devm version Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 16/25] thermal/drivers/qcom-spmi: Use devm_iio_channel_get Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 17/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Move the clk setup in the corresponding functions Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 18/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Use round up step value Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 19/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Put platform code together Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  4:37     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 20/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Add platform prefix to function name Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  4:36     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 21/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Prepare to add support for other hisi platforms Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  4:36     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 22/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Add support for multi temp threshold Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  4:38     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 23/25] dt-bindings: Document the hi3660 thermal sensor binding Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02     ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 24/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Add support for hi3660 SoC Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-17  4:39     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-10-18  9:15       ` [PATCH] thermal/drivers/hisi: disable multi alarm " Tao Wang
2017-10-18  9:15         ` Tao Wang
2017-10-18 15:54         ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-19  1:31           ` Wangtao (Kevin, Kirin)
2017-10-19  1:31             ` Wangtao (Kevin, Kirin)
2017-12-05  2:02             ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-12-05  6:57               ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02   ` [PATCH 25/25] arm64: dts: Register Hi3660's thermal sensor Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02     ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-10 18:02     ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-10-13  8:49     ` Wei Xu
2017-10-13  8:49       ` Wei Xu
2017-10-13  8:49       ` Wei Xu
2017-10-16 21:50   ` [PATCH 01/25] thermal/drivers/hisi: Fix missing interrupt enablement Eduardo Valentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507658570-32675-15-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.wangtao@linaro.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.