From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for tests/perf_pmu: Avoid RT thread for accuracy test
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:10:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152225701337.10679.8615861891261041833@mail.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59f20471-9b2c-058f-9503-f1a3ae22a8ba@linux.intel.com>
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-03-28 17:56:53)
>
> Solid results from this simplified version so far from two runs. But
> it's impossible to know whether it improves (or worsens) the long term
> results on KBL, which had occasional fails, or GLK, which had more
> frequent fails but has disappeared from the farm?
But I have been noticing that we've been drifting from our target ;)
I'm not opposed, I just grew a little attached to that calibration loop.
I really would like to see if we can just drop RT and keep everything
else :)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-26 10:57 [CI i-g-t] tests/perf_pmu: Avoid RT thread for accuracy test Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-03-26 10:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-03-26 11:17 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-26 11:17 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-26 12:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-03-26 12:40 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-03-26 11:23 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-03-26 13:04 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2018-03-27 14:31 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-03-27 17:08 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2018-03-28 9:22 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-03-28 14:36 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-03-28 16:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-03-28 17:10 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2018-04-03 12:38 ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-03 12:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-03 13:10 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-03 13:10 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-04-03 16:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-03 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-03 16:24 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-03 16:24 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-04-03 16:39 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-03 16:39 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-04 9:51 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-04 9:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-11 13:23 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-11 13:23 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-04-11 13:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-11 13:52 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-14 11:35 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-14 11:35 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-04-16 9:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-16 9:55 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-16 10:08 ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-16 10:08 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-04-03 14:23 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/perf_pmu: Avoid RT thread for accuracy test (rev2) Patchwork
2018-04-03 16:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-04-03 17:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/perf_pmu: Avoid RT thread for accuracy test (rev3) Patchwork
2018-04-03 18:33 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-04-04 11:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-04-04 13:46 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/perf_pmu: Avoid RT thread for accuracy test (rev4) Patchwork
2018-04-04 16:58 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152225701337.10679.8615861891261041833@mail.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.