From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
like.xu@intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, jannh@google.com,
arei.gonglei@huawei.com, jmattson@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 05/12] KVM/x86/vPMU: tweak kvm_pmu_get_msr
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:23:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1562548999-37095-6-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1562548999-37095-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com>
This patch changes kvm_pmu_get_msr to get the msr_data struct, because
The host_initiated field from the struct could be used by get_msr. This
also makes this API be consistent with kvm_pmu_set_msr.
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c | 7 ++++---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 7d7ac18..ee6ed47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -315,9 +315,9 @@ bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr);
}
-int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
+int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
- return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->get_msr(vcpu, msr, data);
+ return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->get_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
}
int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index c099b4b..7926b65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops {
int (*is_valid_msr_idx)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx);
bool (*is_valid_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
bool (*lbr_enable)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
- int (*get_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data);
+ int (*get_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
int (*set_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
void (*refresh)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*init)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned pmc, u64 *data);
int kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr_idx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx);
bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
-int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data);
+int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
void kvm_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
index c838838..4a64a3f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
@@ -208,21 +208,22 @@ static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
return ret;
}
-static int amd_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
+static int amd_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+ u32 msr = msr_info->index;
/* MSR_PERFCTRn */
pmc = get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_COUNTER);
if (pmc) {
- *data = pmc_read_counter(pmc);
+ msr_info->data = pmc_read_counter(pmc);
return 0;
}
/* MSR_EVNTSELn */
pmc = get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_EVNTSEL);
if (pmc) {
- *data = pmc->eventsel;
+ msr_info->data = pmc->eventsel;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index ef8ebd4..1e19b01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -297,35 +297,38 @@ static bool intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return true;
}
-static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
+static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+ u32 msr = msr_info->index;
switch (msr) {
case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
- *data = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl;
+ msr_info->data = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl;
return 0;
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS:
- *data = pmu->global_status;
+ msr_info->data = pmu->global_status;
return 0;
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL:
- *data = pmu->global_ctrl;
+ msr_info->data = pmu->global_ctrl;
return 0;
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
- *data = pmu->global_ovf_ctrl;
+ msr_info->data = pmu->global_ovf_ctrl;
return 0;
default:
if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0))) {
u64 val = pmc_read_counter(pmc);
- *data = val & pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP];
+ msr_info->data =
+ val & pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP];
return 0;
} else if ((pmc = get_fixed_pmc(pmu, msr))) {
u64 val = pmc_read_counter(pmc);
- *data = val & pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_FIXED];
+ msr_info->data =
+ val & pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_FIXED];
return 0;
} else if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0))) {
- *data = pmc->eventsel;
+ msr_info->data = pmc->eventsel;
return 0;
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 5ba4e3b..3e34286 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2790,7 +2790,7 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_P6_PERFCTR1:
case MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_P6_EVNTSEL1:
if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index))
- return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index, &msr_info->data);
+ return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
msr_info->data = 0;
break;
case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
@@ -2942,7 +2942,7 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
break;
default:
if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index))
- return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index, &msr_info->data);
+ return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
if (!ignore_msrs) {
vcpu_debug_ratelimited(vcpu, "unhandled rdmsr: 0x%x\n",
msr_info->index);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 1:23 [PATCH v7 00/12] Guest LBR Enabling Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] perf/x86: fix the variable type of the LBR MSRs Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] perf/x86: add a function to get the lbr stack Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] KVM/x86: KVM_CAP_X86_GUEST_LBR Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] KVM/x86: intel_pmu_lbr_enable Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] KVM/x86: expose MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to the guest Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] perf/x86: no counter allocation support Wei Wang
2019-07-08 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 2:58 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 11:36 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] KVM/x86/vPMU: Add APIs to support host save/restore the guest lbr stack Wei Wang
2019-07-08 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 3:04 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 11:34 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10 8:19 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10 8:21 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] perf/x86: save/restore LBR_SELECT on vCPU switching Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] KVM/x86/lbr: lazy save the guest lbr stack Wei Wang
2019-07-08 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-08 15:11 ` Andi Kleen
2019-07-09 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 3:14 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] KVM/x86: remove the common handling of the debugctl msr Wei Wang
2019-07-08 1:23 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] KVM/VMX/vPMU: support to report GLOBAL_STATUS_LBRS_FROZEN Wei Wang
2019-07-08 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-09 3:24 ` Wei Wang
2019-07-09 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10 9:23 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1562548999-37095-6-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.