From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:59:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157118756627.2063440.9878062995925617180.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Changes since v6 [1]:
- Collect Ard's ack / review on patches 5-7, but not on patch 4 since it
needed a non-trivial rework for linker error reported by the 0day robot.
- Fixup "efi: Common enable/disable infrastructure for EFI soft
reservation" with a new dependency on CONFIG_EFI_STUB for
CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE since the efi_soft_reserve_enabled() helper is
only built with EFI_STUB=y and the support depends on early reservations
to keep the kernel text from landing in the reservation. This also
moved the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE) check into the header so
that the stub does not try to link to __efi_soft_reserve_enabled() in
the EFI_STUB=n case.
- Rework "x86/efi: EFI soft reservation to E820 enumeration" to always
add the full EFI memory map when EFI_MEMORY_SP ranges are found. This
simplifies the logic to just add the full EFI map rather than try to
tease out just the EFI_MEMORY_SP ranges. (Ard)
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/157066227329.1059972.5659620631541203458.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
---
Merge notes:
Hi Ingo,
I'm still looking for Ard's ack on the revised patch 4, but otherwise
feel like this is ready for your consideration.
---
The EFI 2.8 Specification [2] introduces the EFI_MEMORY_SP ("specific
purpose") memory attribute. This attribute bit replaces the deprecated
ACPI HMAT "reservation hint" that was introduced in ACPI 6.2 and removed
in ACPI 6.3.
Given the increasing diversity of memory types that might be advertised
to the operating system, there is a need for platform firmware to hint
which memory ranges are free for the OS to use as general purpose memory
and which ranges are intended for application specific usage. For
example, an application with prior knowledge of the platform may expect
to be able to exclusively allocate a precious / limited pool of high
bandwidth memory. Alternatively, for the general purpose case, the
operating system may want to make the memory available on a best effort
basis as a unique numa-node with performance properties by the new
CONFIG_HMEM_REPORTING [3] facility.
In support of optionally allowing either application-exclusive and
core-kernel-mm managed access to differentiated memory, claim
EFI_MEMORY_SP ranges for exposure as "soft reserved" and assigned to a
device-dax instance by default. Such instances can be directly owned /
mapped by a platform-topology-aware application. Alternatively, with the
new kmem facility [4], the administrator has the option to instead
designate that those memory ranges be hot-added to the core-kernel-mm as
a unique memory numa-node. In short, allow for the decision about what
software agent manages soft-reserved memory to be made at runtime.
The patches build on the new HMAT+HMEM_REPORTING facilities merged
for v5.2-rc1. The implementation is tested with qemu emulation of HMAT
[5] plus the efi_fake_mem facility for applying the EFI_MEMORY_SP
attribute. Specific details on reproducing the test configuration are in
patch 12.
[2]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_8_final.pdf
[3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e1cf33aafb84
[4]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c221c0b0308f
[5]: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1096737/
---
Dan Williams (12):
acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory
efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP
x86/efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines
efi: Common enable/disable infrastructure for EFI soft reservation
x86/efi: EFI soft reservation to E820 enumeration
arm/efi: EFI soft reservation to memblock
x86/efi: Add efi_fake_mem support for EFI_MEMORY_SP
lib: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator
dax: Fix alloc_dax_region() compile warning
device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices
acpi/numa/hmat: Register HMAT at device_initcall level
acpi/numa/hmat: Register "soft reserved" memory as an "hmem" device
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 19 +++
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2
arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 6 +
arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 46 +++++++-
arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h | 8 +
arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 17 +++
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 12 ++
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 18 +--
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 54 ++++++++-
arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 3 +
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 9 --
drivers/acpi/Makefile | 3 -
drivers/acpi/hmat/Makefile | 2
drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/acpi/numa/Makefile | 3 +
drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 0
drivers/dax/Kconfig | 27 ++++-
drivers/dax/Makefile | 2
drivers/dax/bus.c | 2
drivers/dax/bus.h | 2
drivers/dax/dax-private.h | 2
drivers/dax/hmem.c | 56 +++++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 21 ++++
drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 5 +
drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c | 9 ++
drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 24 ++++
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 13 ++
drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c | 3 +
drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c | 26 ++--
drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.h | 10 ++
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm32-stub.c | 5 +
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c | 19 +++
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c | 4 +
drivers/firmware/efi/x86_fake_mem.c | 69 ++++++++++++
drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig | 1
drivers/nvdimm/core.c | 1
drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h | 1
drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 13 +-
include/linux/efi.h | 16 +++
include/linux/ioport.h | 1
include/linux/memregion.h | 23 ++++
lib/Kconfig | 3 +
lib/Makefile | 1
lib/memregion.c | 18 +++
45 files changed, 634 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 drivers/acpi/hmat/Makefile
rename drivers/acpi/{hmat/Kconfig => numa/Kconfig} (75%)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/numa/Makefile
rename drivers/acpi/{hmat/hmat.c => numa/hmat.c} (85%)
rename drivers/acpi/{numa.c => numa/srat.c} (100%)
create mode 100644 drivers/dax/hmem.c
create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.h
create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/x86_fake_mem.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/memregion.h
create mode 100644 lib/memregion.c
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 0:59 Dan Williams [this message]
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory Dan Williams
2019-10-18 9:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-22 10:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-22 16:48 ` Dan Williams
2019-10-28 15:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-29 3:06 ` Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] x86/efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] efi: Common enable/disable infrastructure for EFI soft reservation Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] x86/efi: EFI soft reservation to E820 enumeration Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] arm/efi: EFI soft reservation to memblock Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] x86/efi: Add efi_fake_mem support for EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] lib: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] dax: Fix alloc_dax_region() compile warning Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] acpi/numa/hmat: Register HMAT at device_initcall level Dan Williams
2019-10-17 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] acpi/numa/hmat: Register "soft reserved" memory as an "hmem" device Dan Williams
2019-10-17 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 6:54 ` [PATCH v7 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-16 15:33 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157118756627.2063440.9878062995925617180.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.