From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Rename __seqprop() users
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 10:35:44 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160699174442.3364.5902068863671967661.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110115358.GE2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ab440b2c604b60fe90885270fcfeb5c3dd5d6fae
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ab440b2c604b60fe90885270fcfeb5c3dd5d6fae
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:44:17 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:20:51 +01:00
seqlock: Rename __seqprop() users
More consistent naming should make it easier to untangle the _Generic
token pasting maze called __seqprop().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110115358.GE2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 8d85524..d89134c 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -307,10 +307,10 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
__seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop), \
__seqprop_case((s), ww_mutex, prop))
-#define __seqcount_ptr(s) __seqprop(s, ptr)
-#define __seqcount_sequence(s) __seqprop(s, sequence)
-#define __seqcount_lock_preemptible(s) __seqprop(s, preemptible)
-#define __seqcount_assert_lock_held(s) __seqprop(s, assert)
+#define seqprop_ptr(s) __seqprop(s, ptr)
+#define seqprop_sequence(s) __seqprop(s, sequence)
+#define seqprop_preemptible(s) __seqprop(s, preemptible)
+#define seqprop_assert(s) __seqprop(s, assert)
/**
* __read_seqcount_begin() - begin a seqcount_t read section w/o barrier
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
({ \
unsigned __seq; \
\
- while ((__seq = __seqcount_sequence(s)) & 1) \
+ while ((__seq = seqprop_sequence(s)) & 1) \
cpu_relax(); \
\
kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX); \
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
*/
#define read_seqcount_begin(s) \
({ \
- seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(__seqcount_ptr(s)); \
+ seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(seqprop_ptr(s)); \
raw_read_seqcount_begin(s); \
})
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
*/
#define raw_read_seqcount(s) \
({ \
- unsigned __seq = __seqcount_sequence(s); \
+ unsigned __seq = seqprop_sequence(s); \
\
smp_rmb(); \
kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX); \
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
* Return: true if a read section retry is required, else false
*/
#define __read_seqcount_retry(s, start) \
- __read_seqcount_t_retry(__seqcount_ptr(s), start)
+ __read_seqcount_t_retry(seqprop_ptr(s), start)
static inline int __read_seqcount_t_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
{
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static inline int __read_seqcount_t_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
* Return: true if a read section retry is required, else false
*/
#define read_seqcount_retry(s, start) \
- read_seqcount_t_retry(__seqcount_ptr(s), start)
+ read_seqcount_t_retry(seqprop_ptr(s), start)
static inline int read_seqcount_t_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
{
@@ -459,10 +459,10 @@ static inline int read_seqcount_t_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
*/
#define raw_write_seqcount_begin(s) \
do { \
- if (__seqcount_lock_preemptible(s)) \
+ if (seqprop_preemptible(s)) \
preempt_disable(); \
\
- raw_write_seqcount_t_begin(__seqcount_ptr(s)); \
+ raw_write_seqcount_t_begin(seqprop_ptr(s)); \
} while (0)
static inline void raw_write_seqcount_t_begin(seqcount_t *s)
@@ -478,9 +478,9 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_t_begin(seqcount_t *s)
*/
#define raw_write_seqcount_end(s) \
do { \
- raw_write_seqcount_t_end(__seqcount_ptr(s)); \
+ raw_write_seqcount_t_end(seqprop_ptr(s)); \
\
- if (__seqcount_lock_preemptible(s)) \
+ if (seqprop_preemptible(s)) \
preempt_enable(); \
} while (0)
@@ -501,12 +501,12 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_t_end(seqcount_t *s)
*/
#define write_seqcount_begin_nested(s, subclass) \
do { \
- __seqcount_assert_lock_held(s); \
+ seqprop_assert(s); \
\
- if (__seqcount_lock_preemptible(s)) \
+ if (seqprop_preemptible(s)) \
preempt_disable(); \
\
- write_seqcount_t_begin_nested(__seqcount_ptr(s), subclass); \
+ write_seqcount_t_begin_nested(seqprop_ptr(s), subclass); \
} while (0)
static inline void write_seqcount_t_begin_nested(seqcount_t *s, int subclass)
@@ -528,12 +528,12 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_t_begin_nested(seqcount_t *s, int subclass)
*/
#define write_seqcount_begin(s) \
do { \
- __seqcount_assert_lock_held(s); \
+ seqprop_assert(s); \
\
- if (__seqcount_lock_preemptible(s)) \
+ if (seqprop_preemptible(s)) \
preempt_disable(); \
\
- write_seqcount_t_begin(__seqcount_ptr(s)); \
+ write_seqcount_t_begin(seqprop_ptr(s)); \
} while (0)
static inline void write_seqcount_t_begin(seqcount_t *s)
@@ -549,9 +549,9 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_t_begin(seqcount_t *s)
*/
#define write_seqcount_end(s) \
do { \
- write_seqcount_t_end(__seqcount_ptr(s)); \
+ write_seqcount_t_end(seqprop_ptr(s)); \
\
- if (__seqcount_lock_preemptible(s)) \
+ if (seqprop_preemptible(s)) \
preempt_enable(); \
} while (0)
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_t_end(seqcount_t *s)
* }
*/
#define raw_write_seqcount_barrier(s) \
- raw_write_seqcount_t_barrier(__seqcount_ptr(s))
+ raw_write_seqcount_t_barrier(seqprop_ptr(s))
static inline void raw_write_seqcount_t_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
{
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_t_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
* will complete successfully and see data older than this.
*/
#define write_seqcount_invalidate(s) \
- write_seqcount_t_invalidate(__seqcount_ptr(s))
+ write_seqcount_t_invalidate(seqprop_ptr(s))
static inline void write_seqcount_t_invalidate(seqcount_t *s)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 14:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a seqcount between gup_fast and copy_page_range() Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: reorganize internal_get_user_pages_fast() Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-30 16:29 ` Jan Kara
2020-10-30 21:31 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-30 22:36 ` Peter Xu
2020-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: prevent gup_fast from racing with COW during fork Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-30 16:51 ` Jan Kara
2020-10-30 17:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-02 8:31 ` Jan Kara
2020-10-30 21:20 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-30 22:52 ` Peter Xu
2020-10-30 23:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-31 15:26 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-03 0:33 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-03 0:17 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-03 0:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 0:41 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-03 2:20 ` John Hubbard
2020-11-03 6:52 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-03 7:05 ` John Hubbard
2020-11-03 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-03 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-04 1:32 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-04 2:01 ` John Hubbard
2020-11-04 3:17 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-04 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-04 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-04 19:54 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-09 18:38 ` [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Prefix internal seqcount_t-only macros with a "do_" tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-12-09 18:38 ` [tip: locking/core] seqlock: kernel-doc: Specify when preemption is automatically altered tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-10 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: prevent gup_fast from racing with COW during fork Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-03 10:35 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-03 17:03 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-02 23:58 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-02 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a seqcount between gup_fast and copy_page_range() Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-11-02 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-02 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-02 23:18 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160699174442.3364.5902068863671967661.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.