All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kev Jackson <foamdino@gmail.com>
Cc: bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com,
	yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fixes incorrect rx_ring_setup_done
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:50:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162311340336.30910.107622073412741714.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YL4aU4f3Aaik7CN0@linux-dev>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:08:35 +0100 you wrote:
> When calling xsk_socket__create_shared(), the logic at line 1097 marks a
> boolean flag true within the xsk_umem structure to track setup progress
> in order to support multiple calls to the function.  However, instead of
> marking umem->tx_ring_setup_done, the code incorrectly sets
> umem->rx_ring_setup_done.  This leads to improper behaviour when
> creating and destroying xsk and umem structures.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - libbpf: Fixes incorrect rx_ring_setup_done
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/11fc79fc9f2e

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 13:08 [PATCH] libbpf: Fixes incorrect rx_ring_setup_done Kev Jackson
2021-06-07 15:04 ` Yonghong Song
2021-06-08  0:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-06-08  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162311340336.30910.107622073412741714.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=foamdino@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.