All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
To: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: <collinsd@codeaurora.org>, <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
	<quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>,
	Ashay Jaiswal <ashayj@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 4/9] spmi: pmic-arb: add support to dispatch interrupt based on IRQ status
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:30:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1627446609-9064-5-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1627446609-9064-1-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>

From: Ashay Jaiswal <ashayj@codeaurora.org>

Current implementation of SPMI arbiter dispatches interrupt based on the
Arbiter's accumulator status, in some cases the accumulator status may
remain zero and the interrupt remains un-handled. Add logic to dispatch
interrupts based Arbiter's IRQ status if the accumulator status is zero.

Signed-off-by: Ashay Jaiswal <ashayj@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index c4adc06..59c445b 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -525,12 +525,18 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 	u8 ee = pmic_arb->ee;
 	u32 status, enable;
 	int i, id, apid;
+	/* status based dispatch */
+	bool acc_valid = false;
+	u32 irq_status = 0;
 
 	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
 	for (i = first; i <= last; ++i) {
 		status = readl_relaxed(
 				ver_ops->owner_acc_status(pmic_arb, ee, i));
+		if (status)
+			acc_valid = true;
+
 		while (status) {
 			id = ffs(status) - 1;
 			status &= ~BIT(id);
@@ -548,6 +554,28 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* ACC_STATUS is empty but IRQ fired check IRQ_STATUS */
+	if (!acc_valid) {
+		for (i = pmic_arb->min_apid; i <= pmic_arb->max_apid; i++) {
+			/* skip if APPS is not irq owner */
+			if (pmic_arb->apid_data[i].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee)
+				continue;
+
+			irq_status = readl_relaxed(
+					     ver_ops->irq_status(pmic_arb, i));
+			if (irq_status) {
+				enable = readl_relaxed(
+					     ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, i));
+				if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT) {
+					dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev,
+						"Dispatching IRQ for apid=%d status=%x\n",
+						i, irq_status);
+					periph_interrupt(pmic_arb, i);
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
 }
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28  4:30 [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 0/9] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 1/9] spmi: pmic-arb: add a print in cleanup_irq Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 2/9] spmi: pmic-arb: do not ack and clear peripheral interrupts " Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 3/9] spmi: pmic-arb: check apid against limits before calling irq handler Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` Fenglin Wu [this message]
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 5/9] spmi: pmic-arb: correct duplicate APID to PPID mapping logic Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 6/9] spmi: pmic-arb: block access for invalid PMIC arbiter v5 SPMI writes Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 7/9] spmi: pmic-arb: support updating interrupt type flags Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 8/9] spmi: pmic-arb: make interrupt support optional Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28  4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 9/9] spmi: pmic-arb: increase SPMI transaction timeout delay Fenglin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1627446609-9064-5-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ashayj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.