All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	andrealmeid@collabora.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] futex: Rename {,__}{,un}queue_me()
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:07:16 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163377403644.25758.6861294518686818049.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210923171111.300673-4-andrealmeid@collabora.com>

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     bce760d34bc2adcfd97e859a91407df51913f7b0
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/bce760d34bc2adcfd97e859a91407df51913f7b0
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:10:52 -03:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:51:08 +02:00

futex: Rename {,__}{,un}queue_me()

In order to prepare introducing these symbols into the global
namespace; rename them:

  s/\<\(__\)*\(un\)*queue_me/\1futex_\2queue/g

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-4-andrealmeid@collabora.com
---
 kernel/futex/core.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index 69d9892..91f94b4 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ struct futex_pi_state {
  * the second.
  *
  * PI futexes are typically woken before they are removed from the hash list via
- * the rt_mutex code. See unqueue_me_pi().
+ * the rt_mutex code. See futex_unqueue_pi().
  */
 struct futex_q {
 	struct plist_node list;
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ enum {
 };
 
 static const struct futex_q futex_q_init = {
-	/* list gets initialized in queue_me()*/
+	/* list gets initialized in futex_queue()*/
 	.key		= FUTEX_KEY_INIT,
 	.bitset		= FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY,
 	.requeue_state	= ATOMIC_INIT(Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE),
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
 	/*
 	 * We get here with hb->lock held, and having found a
 	 * futex_top_waiter(). This means that futex_lock_pi() of said futex_q
-	 * has dropped the hb->lock in between queue_me() and unqueue_me_pi(),
+	 * has dropped the hb->lock in between futex_queue() and futex_unqueue_pi(),
 	 * which in turn means that futex_lock_pi() still has a reference on
 	 * our pi_state.
 	 *
@@ -2421,7 +2421,7 @@ static inline struct futex_hash_bucket *queue_lock(struct futex_q *q)
 	 * Increment the counter before taking the lock so that
 	 * a potential waker won't miss a to-be-slept task that is
 	 * waiting for the spinlock. This is safe as all queue_lock()
-	 * users end up calling queue_me(). Similarly, for housekeeping,
+	 * users end up calling futex_queue(). Similarly, for housekeeping,
 	 * decrement the counter at queue_unlock() when some error has
 	 * occurred and we don't end up adding the task to the list.
 	 */
@@ -2441,7 +2441,7 @@ queue_unlock(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 	hb_waiters_dec(hb);
 }
 
-static inline void __queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 {
 	int prio;
 
@@ -2461,36 +2461,36 @@ static inline void __queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 }
 
 /**
- * queue_me() - Enqueue the futex_q on the futex_hash_bucket
+ * futex_queue() - Enqueue the futex_q on the futex_hash_bucket
  * @q:	The futex_q to enqueue
  * @hb:	The destination hash bucket
  *
  * The hb->lock must be held by the caller, and is released here. A call to
- * queue_me() is typically paired with exactly one call to unqueue_me().  The
- * exceptions involve the PI related operations, which may use unqueue_me_pi()
+ * futex_queue() is typically paired with exactly one call to futex_unqueue().  The
+ * exceptions involve the PI related operations, which may use futex_unqueue_pi()
  * or nothing if the unqueue is done as part of the wake process and the unqueue
  * state is implicit in the state of woken task (see futex_wait_requeue_pi() for
  * an example).
  */
-static inline void queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
 	__releases(&hb->lock)
 {
-	__queue_me(q, hb);
+	__futex_queue(q, hb);
 	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
 }
 
 /**
- * unqueue_me() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket
+ * futex_unqueue() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket
  * @q:	The futex_q to unqueue
  *
- * The q->lock_ptr must not be held by the caller. A call to unqueue_me() must
- * be paired with exactly one earlier call to queue_me().
+ * The q->lock_ptr must not be held by the caller. A call to futex_unqueue() must
+ * be paired with exactly one earlier call to futex_queue().
  *
  * Return:
  *  - 1 - if the futex_q was still queued (and we removed unqueued it);
  *  - 0 - if the futex_q was already removed by the waking thread
  */
-static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
+static int futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q)
 {
 	spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ retry:
  * PI futexes can not be requeued and must remove themselves from the
  * hash bucket. The hash bucket lock (i.e. lock_ptr) is held.
  */
-static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q)
+static void futex_unqueue_pi(struct futex_q *q)
 {
 	__unqueue_futex(q);
 
@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
 }
 
 /**
- * futex_wait_queue_me() - queue_me() and wait for wakeup, timeout, or signal
+ * futex_wait_queue_me() - futex_queue() and wait for wakeup, timeout, or signal
  * @hb:		the futex hash bucket, must be locked by the caller
  * @q:		the futex_q to queue up on
  * @timeout:	the prepared hrtimer_sleeper, or null for no timeout
@@ -2798,11 +2798,11 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
 	/*
 	 * The task state is guaranteed to be set before another task can
 	 * wake it. set_current_state() is implemented using smp_store_mb() and
-	 * queue_me() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
+	 * futex_queue() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
 	 * access to the hash list and forcing another memory barrier.
 	 */
 	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	queue_me(q, hb);
+	futex_queue(q, hb);
 
 	/* Arm the timer */
 	if (timeout)
@@ -2918,12 +2918,12 @@ retry:
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	/* queue_me and wait for wakeup, timeout, or a signal. */
+	/* futex_queue and wait for wakeup, timeout, or a signal. */
 	futex_wait_queue_me(hb, &q, to);
 
 	/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
 	ret = 0;
-	if (!unqueue_me(&q))
+	if (!futex_unqueue(&q))
 		goto out;
 	ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 	if (to && !to->task)
@@ -3049,7 +3049,7 @@ retry_private:
 	/*
 	 * Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done:
 	 */
-	__queue_me(&q, hb);
+	__futex_queue(&q, hb);
 
 	if (trylock) {
 		ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
@@ -3121,7 +3121,7 @@ no_block:
 	if (res)
 		ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
 
-	unqueue_me_pi(&q);
+	futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
 	spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
 	goto out;
 
@@ -3479,7 +3479,7 @@ int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
 		if (res)
 			ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
 
-		unqueue_me_pi(&q);
+		futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
 		spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
 
 		if (ret == -EINTR) {

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-09 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23 17:10 [PATCH v2 00/22] futex: splitup and waitv syscall André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] futex: Move to kernel/futex/ André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-09 14:23     ` André Almeida
2021-10-09 15:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] futex: Split out syscalls André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] futex: Rename {,__}{,un}queue_me() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] futex: Rename futex_wait_queue_me() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] futex: Rename: queue_{,un}lock() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] futex: Rename __unqueue_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] futex: Rename hash_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] futex: Rename: {get,cmpxchg}_futex_value_locked() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] futex: Split out PI futex André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] futex: Rename: hb_waiter_{inc,dec,pending}() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] futex: Rename: match_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] futex: Rename mark_wake_futex() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] futex: Split out requeue André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 16:57     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-10-15 10:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] futex: Split out wait/wake André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] futex: Simplify double_lock_hb() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] futex: Implement sys_futex_waitv() André Almeida
2021-10-06 11:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]     ` <47b13460-27a4-474c-879b-ed1c668e5923@www.fastmail.com>
2021-10-07  9:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-07 13:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] futex,x86: Wire up sys_futex_waitv() André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] futex,arm: " André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] selftests: futex: Add sys_futex_waitv() test André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() timeout André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-11-09 11:18   ` [PATCH v2 20/22] " Vasily Gorbik
2021-11-09 12:52     ` André Almeida
2021-11-09 13:00       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-09 13:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() wouldblock André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:07   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida
2021-09-23 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] futex2: Documentation: Document sys_futex_waitv() uAPI André Almeida
2021-10-09 10:06   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for André Almeida

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=163377403644.25758.6861294518686818049.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrealmeid@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.