From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org, guaneryu@gmail.com, zlang@redhat.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] xfs/128: try to force file allocation behavior
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:30:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166500905541.886939.4232929527218167462.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166500903290.886939.12532028548655386973.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Over the years, I've noticed that this test occasionally fails when I've
programmed the allocator to hand out the minimum amount of space with
each allocation or if extent size hints are enabled:
--- /tmp/fstests/tests/xfs/128.out 2022-09-01 15:09:11.506679341 -0700
+++ /var/tmp/fstests/xfs/128.out.bad 2022-10-04 17:32:50.992000000 -0700
@@ -20,7 +21,9 @@
56ed2f712c91e035adeeb26ed105a982 SCRATCH_MNT/test-128/file3
b81534f439aac5c34ce3ed60a03eba70 SCRATCH_MNT/test-128/file4
Check files
free blocks after creating some reflink copies is in range
free blocks after CoW some reflink copies is in range
-free blocks after defragging all reflink copies is in range
-free blocks after all tests is in range
+free blocks after defragging all reflink copies has value of 8620027
+free blocks after defragging all reflink copies is NOT in range 8651819 .. 8652139
+free blocks after all tests has value of 8620027
+free blocks after all tests is NOT in range 8651867 .. 8652187
It turns out that under the right circumstances, the _pwrite_byte at the
start of this test will end up allocating two extents to file1. This
almost never happens when delalloc is enabled or when the extent size is
large, and is more prone to happening if the extent size is > 1FSB but
small, the allocator hands out small allocations, or if writeback shoots
down pages in random order.
When file1 gets more than 1 extent, problems start to happen. The free
space accounting checks at the end of the test assume that file1 and
file4 still share the same space at the end of the test. This
definitely happens if file1 gets one extent (since fsr ignores
single-extent files), but if there's more than 1, fsr will try to
defragment it. If fsr succeeds in copying the file contents to a temp
file with fewer extents than the source file, it will switch the
contents, but unsharing the contents in the process. This cause the
free space to be lower than expected, and the test fails.
Resolve this situation by preallocating space beforehand to try to set
up file1 with a single space extent. If the test fails and we got more
than one extent, note that in the output.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
tests/xfs/128 | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/128 b/tests/xfs/128
index db5d9a60db..2d2975115e 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/128
+++ b/tests/xfs/128
@@ -34,7 +34,20 @@ margin=160
blksz=65536
real_blksz="$(_get_block_size $testdir)"
blksz_factor=$((blksz / real_blksz))
+
+# The expected free space numbers in this test require file1 and file4 to share
+# the same blocks at the end of the test. Therefore, we need the allocator to
+# give file1 a single extent at the start of the test so that fsr will not be
+# tempted to "defragment" a multi-extent file1 or file4. Defragmenting really
+# means rewriting the file, and if that succeeds on either file, we'll have
+# unshared the space and there will be too little free space. Therefore,
+# preallocate space to try to produce a single extent.
+$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc 0 $((blks * blksz))" $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $((blks * blksz)) $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
+sync
+
+nextents=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c 'stat' $testdir/file1 | grep 'fsxattr.nextents' | awk '{print $3}')
+
_cp_reflink $testdir/file1 $testdir/file2
_cp_reflink $testdir/file2 $testdir/file3
_cp_reflink $testdir/file3 $testdir/file4
@@ -106,10 +119,23 @@ test $c14 = $c24 || echo "File4 changed by defrag"
#echo $free_blocks0 $free_blocks1 $free_blocks2 $free_blocks3
-_within_tolerance "free blocks after creating some reflink copies" $free_blocks1 $((free_blocks0 - (blks * blksz_factor) )) $margin -v
-_within_tolerance "free blocks after CoW some reflink copies" $free_blocks2 $((free_blocks1 - 2)) $margin -v
-_within_tolerance "free blocks after defragging all reflink copies" $free_blocks3 $((free_blocks2 - (blks * 2 * blksz_factor))) $margin -v
-_within_tolerance "free blocks after all tests" $free_blocks3 $((free_blocks0 - (blks * 3 * blksz_factor))) $margin -v
+freesp_bad=0
+
+_within_tolerance "free blocks after creating some reflink copies" \
+ $free_blocks1 $((free_blocks0 - (blks * blksz_factor) )) $margin -v || freesp_bad=1
+
+_within_tolerance "free blocks after CoW some reflink copies" \
+ $free_blocks2 $((free_blocks1 - 2)) $margin -v || freesp_bad=1
+
+_within_tolerance "free blocks after defragging all reflink copies" \
+ $free_blocks3 $((free_blocks2 - (blks * 2 * blksz_factor))) $margin -v || freesp_bad=1
+
+_within_tolerance "free blocks after all tests" \
+ $free_blocks3 $((free_blocks0 - (blks * 3 * blksz_factor))) $margin -v || freesp_bad=1
+
+if [ $freesp_bad -ne 0 ] && [ $nextents -gt 0 ]; then
+ echo "free space checks probably failed because file1 nextents was $nextents"
+fi
# success, all done
status=0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 22:30 [PATCHSET v2 0/6] fstests: random fixes for v2022.09.25 Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-05 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] generic/092: skip test if file allocation unit isn't aligned Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-05 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs/114: fix missing reflink requires Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-05 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs/229: do not _xfs_force_bdev on TEST_DIR Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-05 22:30 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-10-08 11:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs/128: try to force file allocation behavior Zorro Lang
2022-10-08 17:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-09 2:19 ` Zorro Lang
2022-10-09 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-05 22:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] common/populate: don't metadump xfs filesystems twice Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-08 11:12 ` Zorro Lang
2022-10-05 22:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] common/populate: fix _xfs_metadump usage in _scratch_populate_cached Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-08 11:12 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166500905541.886939.4232929527218167462.stgit@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.