From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, martin.lau@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 21:00:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167018761545.21113.14652815039544773708.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221203184557.476871-1-yhs@fb.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 10:45:57 -0800 you wrote:
> Patch set [1] added rcu support for bpf programs. In [1], a rcu
> pointer is considered to be trusted and not null. This is actually
> not true in some cases. The rcu pointer could be null, and for non-null
> rcu pointer, it may have reference count of 0. This small patch set
> fixed this problem. Patch 1 is the kernel fix. Patch 2 adjusted
> selftests properly. Patch 3 added documentation for newly-introduced
> KF_RCU flag.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/3] bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fca1aa75518c
- [bpf-next,v2,2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix rcu_read_lock test with new MEM_RCU semantics
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8723ec22a31d
- [bpf-next,v2,3/3] docs/bpf: Add KF_RCU documentation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f53625649888
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-04 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-03 18:45 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly Yonghong Song
2022-12-03 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] " Yonghong Song
2022-12-03 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix rcu_read_lock test with new MEM_RCU semantics Yonghong Song
2022-12-03 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] docs/bpf: Add KF_RCU documentation Yonghong Song
2022-12-04 21:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167018761545.21113.14652815039544773708.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.