All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] nfsd: rework refcounting in filecache
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 14:03:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17bf0292cbd63b6bb13f6595b5d82c2a173b3ee4.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F8EAC1-7383-4B98-BAD1-D676950718E0@oracle.com>

On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 17:25 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 1, 2022, at 10:46 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > The filecache refcounting is a bit non-standard for something searchable
> > by RCU, in that we maintain a sentinel reference while it's hashed. This
> > in turn requires that we have to do things differently in the "put"
> > depending on whether its hashed, which we believe to have led to races.
> > 
> > There are other problems in here too. nfsd_file_close_inode_sync can end
> > up freeing an nfsd_file while there are still outstanding references to
> > it, and there are a number of subtle ToC/ToU races.
> > 
> > Rework the code so that the refcount is what drives the lifecycle. When
> > the refcount goes to zero, then unhash and rcu free the object.
> > 
> > With this change, the LRU carries a reference. Take special care to
> > deal with it when removing an entry from the list.
> 
> Handful of minor nits below. I'm adding some remarks from the
> other patches here for my own convenience. Nothing earth-
> shattering, the series looks pretty close.
> 
> Test results:
> 
> When I run my test I "watch cat /proc/fs/nfsd/filecache". The
> workload is 12-thread "untar git && make git && make test" on
> NFSv3. It's showing worse eviction behavior than the current
> code.
> 

What do you mean by "worse" here?

> Basically all cached items appear to be immediately placed on
> the LRU. Do you expect this behavior change? We want to keep
> the LRU as short as possible; but maybe the LRU callback is
> stopping after a few items, so it might not matter.
> 

Could be. I'm not sure how that works.

> Can you look into it before I apply? I suspect it's because
> the list_lru_isolate() call is moved after the REFERENCED
> check.
> 

I don't see how we can change the order of operations in the LRU
callback without reintroducing race conditions. The existing check is:

	if (refcount_read(&nf->nf_ref) > 1) {
		list_lru_isolate(lru, &nf->nf_lru);

...which was racy, of course...

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > fs/nfsd/trace.h     |   1 +
> > 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > index 0bf3727455e2..e67297ad12bf 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > @@ -303,8 +303,7 @@ nfsd_file_alloc(struct nfsd_file_lookup_key *key, unsigned int may)
> > 		if (key->gc)
> > 			__set_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags);
> > 		nf->nf_inode = key->inode;
> > -		/* nf_ref is pre-incremented for hash table */
> > -		refcount_set(&nf->nf_ref, 2);
> > +		refcount_set(&nf->nf_ref, 1);
> > 		nf->nf_may = key->need;
> > 		nf->nf_mark = NULL;
> > 	}
> > @@ -353,24 +352,35 @@ nfsd_file_unhash(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > 	return false;
> > }
> > 
> > -static bool
> > +static void
> > nfsd_file_free(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > {
> > 	s64 age = ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), nf->nf_birthtime));
> > -	bool flush = false;
> > 
> > 	trace_nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > 
> > 	this_cpu_inc(nfsd_file_releases);
> > 	this_cpu_add(nfsd_file_total_age, age);
> > 
> > +	nfsd_file_unhash(nf);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We call fsync here in order to catch writeback errors. It's not
> > +	 * strictly required by the protocol, but an nfsd_file coule get
> 
> ^coule^could
> 
> > +	 * evicted from the cache before a COMMIT comes in. If another
> > +	 * task were to open that file in the interim and scrape the error,
> > +	 * then the client may never see it. By calling fsync here, we ensure
> > +	 * that writeback happens before the entry is freed, and that any
> > +	 * errors reported result in the write verifier changing.
> > +	 */
> > +	nfsd_file_fsync(nf);
> 
> I'm wondering if this call should be preceded by
> 
> 	if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags))
> 
> as you suggested last week.
> 
> 
> > +
> > 	if (nf->nf_mark)
> > 		nfsd_file_mark_put(nf->nf_mark);
> > 	if (nf->nf_file) {
> > 		get_file(nf->nf_file);
> > 		filp_close(nf->nf_file, NULL);
> > 		fput(nf->nf_file);
> > -		flush = true;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	/*
> > @@ -378,10 +388,9 @@ nfsd_file_free(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > 	 * WARN and leak it to preserve system stability.
> > 	 */
> > 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&nf->nf_lru)))
> > -		return flush;
> > +		return;
> > 
> > 	call_rcu(&nf->nf_rcu, nfsd_file_slab_free);
> > -	return flush;
> > }
> > 
> > static bool
> > @@ -397,17 +406,23 @@ nfsd_file_check_writeback(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > 		mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
> > }
> > 
> > -static void nfsd_file_lru_add(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > +static bool nfsd_file_lru_add(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > {
> > 	set_bit(NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED, &nf->nf_flags);
> > -	if (list_lru_add(&nfsd_file_lru, &nf->nf_lru))
> > +	if (list_lru_add(&nfsd_file_lru, &nf->nf_lru)) {
> > 		trace_nfsd_file_lru_add(nf);
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> > +	return false;
> > }
> > 
> > -static void nfsd_file_lru_remove(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > +static bool nfsd_file_lru_remove(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > {
> > -	if (list_lru_del(&nfsd_file_lru, &nf->nf_lru))
> > +	if (list_lru_del(&nfsd_file_lru, &nf->nf_lru)) {
> > 		trace_nfsd_file_lru_del(nf);
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> > +	return false;
> > }
> > 
> > struct nfsd_file *
> > @@ -418,86 +433,80 @@ nfsd_file_get(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > 	return NULL;
> > }
> > 
> > -static void
> > +/**
> > + * nfsd_file_unhash_and_queue - unhash a file and queue it to the dispose list
> > + * @nf: nfsd_file to be unhashed and queued
> > + * @dispose: list to which it should be queued
> > + *
> > + * Attempt to unhash a nfsd_file and queue it to the given list. Each file
> > + * will have a reference held on behalf of the list. That reference may come
> > + * from the LRU, or we may need to take one. If we can't get a reference,
> > + * ignore it altogether.
> > + */
> > +static bool
> > nfsd_file_unhash_and_queue(struct nfsd_file *nf, struct list_head *dispose)
> > {
> > 	trace_nfsd_file_unhash_and_queue(nf);
> > 	if (nfsd_file_unhash(nf)) {
> > -		/* caller must call nfsd_file_dispose_list() later */
> > -		nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If we remove it from the LRU, then just use that
> > +		 * reference for the dispose list. Otherwise, we need
> > +		 * to take a reference. If that fails, just ignore
> > +		 * the file altogether.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf) && !nfsd_file_get(nf))
> > +			return false;
> > 		list_add(&nf->nf_lru, dispose);
> > +		return true;
> > 	}
> > +	return false;
> > }
> > 
> > -static void
> > -nfsd_file_put_noref(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > -{
> > -	trace_nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > -
> > -	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref)) {
> > -		WARN_ON(test_bit(NFSD_FILE_HASHED, &nf->nf_flags));
> > -		nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf);
> > -		nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > -	}
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -nfsd_file_unhash_and_put(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > -{
> > -	if (nfsd_file_unhash(nf))
> > -		nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > -}
> > -
> > +/**
> > + * nfsd_file_put - put the reference to a nfsd_file
> > + * @nf: nfsd_file of which to put the reference
> > + *
> > + * Put a reference to a nfsd_file. In the v4 case, we just put the
> > + * reference immediately. In the GC case, if the reference would be
> > + * the last one, the put it on the LRU instead to be cleaned up later.
> > + */
> > void
> > nfsd_file_put(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > {
> > 	might_sleep();
> > +	trace_nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > 
> > -	if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags))
> > -		nfsd_file_lru_add(nf);
> > -	else if (refcount_read(&nf->nf_ref) == 2)
> > -		nfsd_file_unhash_and_put(nf);
> > -
> > -	if (!test_bit(NFSD_FILE_HASHED, &nf->nf_flags)) {
> > -		nfsd_file_fsync(nf);
> > -		nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > -	} else if (nf->nf_file && test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags)) {
> > -		nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > -		nfsd_file_schedule_laundrette();
> > -	} else
> > -		nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -nfsd_file_dispose_list(struct list_head *dispose)
> > -{
> > -	struct nfsd_file *nf;
> > -
> > -	while(!list_empty(dispose)) {
> > -		nf = list_first_entry(dispose, struct nfsd_file, nf_lru);
> > -		list_del_init(&nf->nf_lru);
> > -		nfsd_file_fsync(nf);
> > -		nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The HASHED check is racy. We may end up with the occasional
> > +	 * unhashed entry on the LRU, but they should get cleaned up
> > +	 * like any other.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags) &&
> > +	    test_bit(NFSD_FILE_HASHED, &nf->nf_flags)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If this is the last reference (nf_ref == 1), then transfer
> > +		 * it to the LRU. If the add to the LRU fails, just put it as
> > +		 * usual.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (refcount_dec_not_one(&nf->nf_ref) || nfsd_file_lru_add(nf)) {
> > +			nfsd_file_schedule_laundrette();
> > +			return;
> > +		}
> 
> A subsequent patch adds the words "fall through" in a comment, and
> checkscript flags that. I changed that comment to:
> 
> +                       /*
> +                        * We're racing with unhashing, so try to remove it from
> +                        * the LRU. If removal fails, then someone else already
> +                        * has our reference.
> +                        */
> 
> to mollify it.
> 
> 
> > 	}
> > +	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref))
> > +		nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > }
> > 
> > static void
> > -nfsd_file_dispose_list_sync(struct list_head *dispose)
> > +nfsd_file_dispose_list(struct list_head *dispose)
> > {
> > -	bool flush = false;
> > 	struct nfsd_file *nf;
> > 
> > 	while(!list_empty(dispose)) {
> > 		nf = list_first_entry(dispose, struct nfsd_file, nf_lru);
> > 		list_del_init(&nf->nf_lru);
> > -		nfsd_file_fsync(nf);
> > -		if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref))
> > -			continue;
> > -		if (nfsd_file_free(nf))
> > -			flush = true;
> > +		nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > 	}
> > -	if (flush)
> > -		flush_delayed_fput();
> > }
> > 
> > static void
> > @@ -567,21 +576,8 @@ nfsd_file_lru_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_one *lru,
> > 	struct list_head *head = arg;
> > 	struct nfsd_file *nf = list_entry(item, struct nfsd_file, nf_lru);
> > 
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Do a lockless refcount check. The hashtable holds one reference, so
> > -	 * we look to see if anything else has a reference, or if any have
> > -	 * been put since the shrinker last ran. Those don't get unhashed and
> > -	 * released.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * Note that in the put path, we set the flag and then decrement the
> > -	 * counter. Here we check the counter and then test and clear the flag.
> > -	 * That order is deliberate to ensure that we can do this locklessly.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (refcount_read(&nf->nf_ref) > 1) {
> > -		list_lru_isolate(lru, &nf->nf_lru);
> > -		trace_nfsd_file_gc_in_use(nf);
> > -		return LRU_REMOVED;
> > -	}
> > +	/* We should only be dealing with GC entries here */
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags));
> > 
> > 	/*
> > 	 * Don't throw out files that are still undergoing I/O or
> > @@ -592,40 +588,30 @@ nfsd_file_lru_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_one *lru,
> > 		return LRU_SKIP;
> > 	}
> > 
> > +	/* If it was recently added to the list, skip it */
> > 	if (test_and_clear_bit(NFSD_FILE_REFERENCED, &nf->nf_flags)) {
> > 		trace_nfsd_file_gc_referenced(nf);
> > 		return LRU_ROTATE;
> > 	}
> > 
> > -	if (!test_and_clear_bit(NFSD_FILE_HASHED, &nf->nf_flags)) {
> > -		trace_nfsd_file_gc_hashed(nf);
> > -		return LRU_SKIP;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Put the reference held on behalf of the LRU. If it wasn't the last
> > +	 * one, then just remove it from the LRU and ignore it.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref)) {
> > +		trace_nfsd_file_gc_in_use(nf);
> > +		list_lru_isolate(lru, &nf->nf_lru);
> > +		return LRU_REMOVED;
> > 	}
> > 
> > +	/* Refcount went to zero. Unhash it and queue it to the dispose list */
> > +	nfsd_file_unhash(nf);
> > 	list_lru_isolate_move(lru, &nf->nf_lru, head);
> > 	this_cpu_inc(nfsd_file_evictions);
> > 	trace_nfsd_file_gc_disposed(nf);
> > 	return LRU_REMOVED;
> > }
> > 
> > -/*
> > - * Unhash items on @dispose immediately, then queue them on the
> > - * disposal workqueue to finish releasing them in the background.
> > - *
> > - * cel: Note that between the time list_lru_shrink_walk runs and
> > - * now, these items are in the hash table but marked unhashed.
> > - * Why release these outside of lru_cb ? There's no lock ordering
> > - * problem since lru_cb currently takes no lock.
> > - */
> > -static void nfsd_file_gc_dispose_list(struct list_head *dispose)
> > -{
> > -	struct nfsd_file *nf;
> > -
> > -	list_for_each_entry(nf, dispose, nf_lru)
> > -		nfsd_file_hash_remove(nf);
> > -	nfsd_file_dispose_list_delayed(dispose);
> > -}
> > -
> > static void
> > nfsd_file_gc(void)
> > {
> > @@ -635,7 +621,7 @@ nfsd_file_gc(void)
> > 	ret = list_lru_walk(&nfsd_file_lru, nfsd_file_lru_cb,
> > 			    &dispose, list_lru_count(&nfsd_file_lru));
> > 	trace_nfsd_file_gc_removed(ret, list_lru_count(&nfsd_file_lru));
> > -	nfsd_file_gc_dispose_list(&dispose);
> > +	nfsd_file_dispose_list_delayed(&dispose);
> > }
> > 
> > static void
> > @@ -660,7 +646,7 @@ nfsd_file_lru_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
> > 	ret = list_lru_shrink_walk(&nfsd_file_lru, sc,
> > 				   nfsd_file_lru_cb, &dispose);
> > 	trace_nfsd_file_shrinker_removed(ret, list_lru_count(&nfsd_file_lru));
> > -	nfsd_file_gc_dispose_list(&dispose);
> > +	nfsd_file_dispose_list_delayed(&dispose);
> > 	return ret;
> > }
> > 
> > @@ -671,8 +657,11 @@ static struct shrinker	nfsd_file_shrinker = {
> > };
> > 
> > /*
> > - * Find all cache items across all net namespaces that match @inode and
> > - * move them to @dispose. The lookup is atomic wrt nfsd_file_acquire().
> > + * Find all cache items across all net namespaces that match @inode, unhash
> > + * them, take references and then put them on @dispose if that was successful.
> > + *
> > + * The nfsd_file objects on the list will be unhashed, and each will have a
> > + * reference taken.
> >  */
> > static unsigned int
> > __nfsd_file_close_inode(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *dispose)
> > @@ -690,8 +679,9 @@ __nfsd_file_close_inode(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *dispose)
> > 				       nfsd_file_rhash_params);
> > 		if (!nf)
> > 			break;
> > -		nfsd_file_unhash_and_queue(nf, dispose);
> > -		count++;
> > +
> > +		if (nfsd_file_unhash_and_queue(nf, dispose))
> > +			count++;
> > 	} while (1);
> > 	rcu_read_unlock();
> > 	return count;
> > @@ -703,15 +693,23 @@ __nfsd_file_close_inode(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *dispose)
> >  *
> >  * Unhash and put all cache item associated with @inode.
> >  */
> > -static void
> > +static unsigned int
> > nfsd_file_close_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > -	LIST_HEAD(dispose);
> > +	struct nfsd_file *nf;
> > 	unsigned int count;
> > +	LIST_HEAD(dispose);
> > 
> > 	count = __nfsd_file_close_inode(inode, &dispose);
> > 	trace_nfsd_file_close_inode(inode, count);
> > -	nfsd_file_dispose_list_delayed(&dispose);
> > +	while(!list_empty(&dispose)) {
> 
> checkpatch complained about wanting whitespace between "while"
> and "(!list_empty())".
> 
> 
> > +		nf = list_first_entry(&dispose, struct nfsd_file, nf_lru);
> > +		list_del_init(&nf->nf_lru);
> > +		trace_nfsd_file_closing(nf);
> > +		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref))
> > +			nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > +	}
> > +	return count;
> > }
> > 
> > /**
> > @@ -723,19 +721,15 @@ nfsd_file_close_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > void
> > nfsd_file_close_inode_sync(struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > -	LIST_HEAD(dispose);
> > -	unsigned int count;
> > -
> > -	count = __nfsd_file_close_inode(inode, &dispose);
> > -	trace_nfsd_file_close_inode_sync(inode, count);
> > -	nfsd_file_dispose_list_sync(&dispose);
> > +	if (nfsd_file_close_inode(inode))
> > +		flush_delayed_fput();
> > }
> > 
> > /**
> >  * nfsd_file_delayed_close - close unused nfsd_files
> >  * @work: dummy
> >  *
> > - * Walk the LRU list and close any entries that have not been used since
> > + * Walk the LRU list and destroy any entries that have not been used since
> >  * the last scan.
> >  */
> > static void
> > @@ -1056,8 +1050,10 @@ nfsd_file_do_acquire(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> > 	rcu_read_lock();
> > 	nf = rhashtable_lookup(&nfsd_file_rhash_tbl, &key,
> > 			       nfsd_file_rhash_params);
> > -	if (nf)
> > -		nf = nfsd_file_get(nf);
> > +	if (nf) {
> > +		if (!nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf))
> > +			nf = nfsd_file_get(nf);
> > +	}
> > 	rcu_read_unlock();
> > 	if (nf)
> > 		goto wait_for_construction;
> > @@ -1092,11 +1088,11 @@ nfsd_file_do_acquire(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> > 			goto out;
> > 		}
> > 		open_retry = false;
> > -		nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > +		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref))
> > +			nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > 		goto retry;
> > 	}
> > 
> > -	nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf);
> > 	this_cpu_inc(nfsd_file_cache_hits);
> > 
> > 	status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(file_inode(nf->nf_file), may_flags));
> > @@ -1106,7 +1102,8 @@ nfsd_file_do_acquire(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> > 			this_cpu_inc(nfsd_file_acquisitions);
> > 		*pnf = nf;
> > 	} else {
> > -		nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > +		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&nf->nf_ref))
> > +			nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > 		nf = NULL;
> > 	}
> > 
> > @@ -1133,7 +1130,7 @@ nfsd_file_do_acquire(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> > 	 * then unhash.
> > 	 */
> > 	if (status != nfs_ok || key.inode->i_nlink == 0)
> > -		nfsd_file_unhash_and_put(nf);
> > +		nfsd_file_unhash(nf);
> > 	clear_bit_unlock(NFSD_FILE_PENDING, &nf->nf_flags);
> > 	smp_mb__after_atomic();
> > 	wake_up_bit(&nf->nf_flags, NFSD_FILE_PENDING);
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/trace.h b/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> > index 940252482fd4..a44ded06af87 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> > @@ -906,6 +906,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(nfsd_file_class, name, \
> > DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_EVENT(nfsd_file_free);
> > DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_EVENT(nfsd_file_unhash);
> > DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_EVENT(nfsd_file_put);
> > +DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_EVENT(nfsd_file_closing);
> > DEFINE_NFSD_FILE_EVENT(nfsd_file_unhash_and_queue);
> > 
> > TRACE_EVENT(nfsd_file_alloc,
> > -- 
> > 2.38.1
> > 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-01 14:46 [PATCH v5 0/5] nfsd: clean up refcounting in the filecache Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 14:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] nfsd: remove the pages_flushed statistic from filecache Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 14:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] nfsd: reorganize filecache.c Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 20:59   ` NeilBrown
2022-11-01 21:04     ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 14:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] nfsd: rework refcounting in filecache Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 17:25   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 18:03     ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2022-11-01 18:57       ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 19:13         ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 20:21           ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 18:15     ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 21:23   ` NeilBrown
2022-11-01 21:39     ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 21:49       ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 22:04         ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 22:05       ` NeilBrown
2022-11-01 22:42         ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-02 16:58           ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-02 18:07             ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-02 18:29               ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-02 18:34               ` Jeff Layton
2023-01-17 15:16   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-17 15:22     ` Chuck Lever III
2023-01-17 15:59       ` Jeff Layton
2023-01-18 16:48         ` Shachar Kagan
2023-01-18 17:18           ` Jeff Layton
2023-01-18 18:41             ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 14:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] nfsd: close race between unhashing and LRU addition Jeff Layton
2022-11-01 19:45   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 21:12   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-11-01 14:46 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] nfsd: fix up the filecache laundrette scheduling Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17bf0292cbd63b6bb13f6595b5d82c2a173b3ee4.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.