All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned data"
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:09:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e77ade4fb1d924ffaf226cb946ba3314ba59a1d.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb8d3d2a-b843-49d5-a219-10a29b5877d0@roeck-us.net>

On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 07:06 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:34:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 3/25/24 00:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > Hi Guenter,
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 16:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > This reverts commit cadc4e1a2b4d20d0cc0e81f2c6ba0588775e54e5.
> > > > 
> > > > Commit cadc4e1a2b4d ("sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
> > > > data") causes bad checksum calculations on unaligned data. Reverting
> > > > it fixes the problem.
> > > > 
> > > >      # Subtest: checksum
> > > >      # module: checksum_kunit
> > > >      1..5
> > > >      # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:500
> > > >      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
> > > >          ( u64)result == 53378 (0xd082)
> > > >          ( u64)expec == 33488 (0x82d0)
> > > >      # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      not ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
> > > >      # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:525
> > > >      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
> > > >          ( u64)result == 65281 (0xff01)
> > > >          ( u64)expec == 65280 (0xff00)
> > > >      # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      not ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
> > > >      # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:573
> > > >      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
> > > >          ( u64)result == 65535 (0xffff)
> > > >          ( u64)expec == 65534 (0xfffe)
> > > >      # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      not ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs
> > > >      # test_ip_fast_csum: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
> > > >      # test_csum_ipv6_magic: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
> > > >      ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
> > > >   # checksum: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
> > > >   # Totals: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
> > > > not ok 22 checksum
> > > 
> > > Can you tell me how the tests are run so I can try to verify this on real hardware?
> > > 
> > 
> > Enabling CONFIG_KUNIT and CHECKSUM_KUNIT and booting with those tests enabled
> > should do it.
> > 
> 
> Did you have time to test this on real hardware ?

Not yet. I just returned from Easter holidays and need to get synced with work first.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-24 23:18 [PATCH] Revert "sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned data" Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25  7:39 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-03-25 14:34   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-02 14:06     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-02 14:09       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [this message]
2024-05-01  8:28         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-01 14:44           ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-01 14:49             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-02  7:21           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-05-02  7:23             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-03-25 15:35   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-02 10:28 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e77ade4fb1d924ffaf226cb946ba3314ba59a1d.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --to=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.