All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, "mjg59@google.com" <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/11] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if an HMAC key is loaded
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:12:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f0530bc9b974951ae0bb1e2beb02422@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f5603489b16918de5d3cbb73c1a7c0e835f0671.camel@linux.ibm.com>

> From: Mimi Zohar [mailto:zohar@linux.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 3:42 PM
> On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 13:29 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is an EVM initialization flag that can be
> set to
> > temporarily disable metadata verification until all xattrs/attrs necessary
> > to verify an EVM portable signature are copied to the file. This flag is
> > cleared when EVM is initialized with an HMAC key, to avoid that the HMAC is
> > calculated on unverified xattrs/attrs.
> >
> > Currently EVM unnecessarily denies setting this flag if EVM is initialized
> > with a public key, which is not a concern as it cannot be used to trust
> > xattrs/attrs updates. This patch removes this limitation.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16.x
> > Fixes: ae1ba1676b88e ("EVM: Allow userland to permit modification of EVM-
> protected metadata")
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> 
> Once the comments below are addressed,
> 
> Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/evm      | 5 +++--
> >  security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 5 ++---
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> > index 3c477ba48a31..eb6d70fd6fa2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> > @@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ Description:
> >  		modification of EVM-protected metadata and
> >  		disable all further modification of policy
> >
> > -		Note that once a key has been loaded, it will no longer be
> > -		possible to enable metadata modification.
> > +		Note that once an HMAC key has been loaded, it will no longer
> > +		be possible to enable metadata modification and, if it is
> > +		already enabled, it will be disabled.
> 
> It's worth mentioning that echo'ing a new value is additive.  Once EVM
> metadata modification is enabled, the only way of disabling it is by
> enabling an HMAC key.  It's also worth mentioning that metadata writes
> are only permitted once further changes to the EVM policy are disabled.

If I'm not wrong, it is not required to set EVM_SETUP_COMPLETE to allow
metadata writes. I think the original idea was to boot a system in a way
that portable signatures can be written, and then to enable enforcement.

Roberto

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli

> Perhaps the best way of explaining this is by including a new example -
> echo 6> <securityfs>/evm.
> 
> >
> >  		Until key loading has been signaled EVM can not create
> >  		or validate the 'security.evm' xattr, but returns
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> > index bbc85637e18b..860c48b9a0c3 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> > @@ -81,11 +81,10 @@ static ssize_t evm_write_key(struct file *file, const
> char __user *buf,
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	/* Don't allow a request to freshly enable metadata writes if
> > -	 * keys are loaded.
> > +	 * an HMAC key is loaded.
> >  	 */
> 
> Please drop the word "freshly".  While updating the comment, please
> move the sentence starting with "Don't" to a new line.
> 
> >  	if ((i & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES) &&
> > -	    ((evm_initialized & EVM_KEY_MASK) != 0) &&
> > -	    !(evm_initialized & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES))
> > +	    (evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) != 0)
> >  		return -EPERM;
> >
> >  	if (i & EVM_INIT_HMAC) {
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-05 11:29 [PATCH v6 00/11] evm: Improve usability of portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when an HMAC key is loaded Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] evm: Load EVM key in ima_load_x509() to avoid appraisal Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if an HMAC key is loaded Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 13:41   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-11 14:12     ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2021-05-11 19:53       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] evm: Introduce evm_status_revalidate() Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 13:42   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] evm: Introduce evm_hmac_disabled() to safely ignore verification errors Roberto Sassu
2021-05-07 13:31   ` [RESEND][PATCH " Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 13:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] evm: Pass user namespace to set/remove xattr hooks Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for unmodified metadata Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 14:11   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-11 14:21     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 14:40       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-11 14:54         ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 20:00           ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] ima: Introduce template field evmsig and write to field sig as fallback Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 22:12   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-12 10:55     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1f0530bc9b974951ae0bb1e2beb02422@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.