All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tytso@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, bunk@kernel.org,
	ego@in.ibm.com, oleg@tv-sign.ru, srostedt@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/9] RCU: Fix barriers
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:33:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070910183305.GB3819@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070910183004.GA3299@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Work in progress, not for inclusion.

Fix rcu_barrier() to work properly in preemptive kernel environment.
Also, the ordering of callback must be preserved while moving
callbacks to another CPU during CPU hotplug.

Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 rcuclassic.c |    2 +-
 rcupdate.c   |   10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.22-a-splitclassic/kernel/rcuclassic.c linux-2.6.22-b-fixbarriers/kernel/rcuclassic.c
--- linux-2.6.22-a-splitclassic/kernel/rcuclassic.c	2007-07-19 15:03:51.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-b-fixbarriers/kernel/rcuclassic.c	2007-07-19 17:10:46.000000000 -0700
@@ -349,9 +349,9 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(struct rcu
 	if (rcp->cur != rcp->completed)
 		cpu_quiet(rdp->cpu, rcp);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&rcp->lock);
+	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->donelist, rdp->donetail);
 	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->curlist, rdp->curtail);
 	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->nxtlist, rdp->nxttail);
-	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->donelist, rdp->donetail);
 }
 
 static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.22-a-splitclassic/kernel/rcupdate.c linux-2.6.22-b-fixbarriers/kernel/rcupdate.c
--- linux-2.6.22-a-splitclassic/kernel/rcupdate.c	2007-07-19 14:19:03.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-b-fixbarriers/kernel/rcupdate.c	2007-07-19 17:13:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -115,7 +115,17 @@ void rcu_barrier(void)
 	mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
 	init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
 	atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 0);
+	/*
+	 * The queueing of callbacks in all CPUs must be atomic with
+	 * respect to RCU, otherwise one CPU may queue a callback,
+	 * wait for a grace period, decrement barrier count and call
+	 * complete(), while other CPUs have not yet queued anything.
+	 * So, we need to make sure that grace periods cannot complete
+	 * until all the callbacks are queued.
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, NULL, 0, 1);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-10 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-10 18:30 [PATCH RFC 0/9] RCU: Preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:32 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] RCU: Split API to permit multiple RCU implementations Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21  4:14   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-10 18:33 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2007-09-10 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] RCU: Preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21  4:17   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-21  5:50     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21  5:56     ` Dipankar Sarma
2007-09-21 14:40   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-21 15:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-21 22:06       ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21 22:31       ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-21 22:44         ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21 23:23           ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-21 23:44             ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-22  0:26     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-22  1:15       ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-22  1:53         ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-22  3:15           ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-22  4:07             ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21 15:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-21 23:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-22  0:32       ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-22  1:19         ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-22  1:43           ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-22  2:56             ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-22  4:10               ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-23 17:38   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-09-24  0:15     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-26 15:13       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-09-27 15:46         ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-28 14:47           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-09-28 18:57             ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-30 16:31               ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-09-30 23:02                 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-01  1:37                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-10-01 18:44                     ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-01 19:21                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-10-01 22:09                         ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-01 22:24                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-10-02 18:02                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-01  1:20                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] RCU: synchronize_sched() workaround for CPU hotplug Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:36 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] RCU: CPU hotplug support for preemptible RCU Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-30 16:38   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-01  1:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:39 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] RCU priority boosting " Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-28 22:56   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-09-28 23:05     ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-30  3:11       ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-10-05 11:46   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-05 12:24     ` Steven Rostedt
2007-10-05 13:21       ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-10-05 14:07         ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:39 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] RCU: rcutorture testing for RCU priority boosting Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:41 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] RCU: Make RCU priority boosting consume less power Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:42 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] RCU: preemptible documentation and comment cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-10 18:44 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] RCU: Preemptible RCU Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070910183305.GB3819@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.