All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: "minyard@acm.org" <minyard@acm.org>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] IPMI: use ACPI detection mechanism firstly to detect IPMI system interface
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:34:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100608013453.GA5167@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275960531.3718.77.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:28:51AM +0800, ykzhao wrote:

> Does there exist the ACPI detection mechanism on the machines you
> mentioned? If exists, does it detect the same IPMI interface with the
> PCI IPMI detection mechanism?

What is "the same"? It's not using the same ioport space, certainly.

> If the two mechanisms will detect the same IPMI interface, I agree with
> what you are concerned.  Do you have an idea/thought to set up the
> relationship between ACPI and IPMI interface? In order to enable that
> AML code can access the IPMI, it should know which IPMI interface will
> be accessed and create the corresponding user interface. If ACPI
> mechanism will fail to register the IPMI interface, maybe it is
> difficult to create the correct user interface.

Well, right now if you change the ordering then the PCI interface will 
never be exposed. It would be preferable to only expose the ACPI 
interface as a user-visible device if there's no prior device - if there 
is, I think the ideal solution would be for it to be an in-kernel only 
device without a corresponding UI.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-08  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07  9:27 [PATCH -v6 0/2] IPMI: Install the ACPI IPMI opregion yakui.zhao
2010-06-07  9:27 ` [PATCH -v6 1/2] IPMI: Install the IPMI space handler to enable ACPI to access the BMC controller yakui.zhao
2010-06-07  9:27   ` [PATCH -v6 2/2] IPMI: use ACPI detection mechanism firstly to detect IPMI system interface yakui.zhao
2010-06-07 12:52     ` Matthew Garrett
2010-06-08  1:28       ` ykzhao
2010-06-08  1:34         ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2010-06-08  5:10           ` ykzhao
2010-06-09  3:02             ` Myron Stowe
2010-06-09 13:08             ` Corey Minyard
2010-06-10  2:34               ` ykzhao
2010-06-10  3:12                 ` Corey Minyard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100608013453.GA5167@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=myron.stowe@hp.com \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.