From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support for memory w/o backing pages
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:57:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326125742.1aa431a9d406bc53159f27dc@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130326145020.GT9021@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:20 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > When adding sg_page_iter I haven't thought properly through the use case
> > for sg lists w/o backing pages - which is specific to the i915 driver -
> > so this patchset adds support for this.
> >
> > It applies on the i915 tree [1], where the iterator is in use already.
> >
> > [1] git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel [nightly branch]
>
> i915 patches are already included in linux-next, so should apply on top of
> that, too. So can this go in through -mm for 3.10 or should I slurp it in
> through drm-intel trees (once it passes review)? I'd like to ditch the
> dummy page hack we're currently using (i.e. patch 2).
Please slurp it - there's little benefit in spreading it across two trees.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 13:14 [PATCH 0/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support for memory w/o backing pages Imre Deak
2013-03-26 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support sg lists " Imre Deak
2013-03-26 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drm/i915: set dummy page for stolen objects" Imre Deak
2013-03-26 14:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support for memory w/o backing pages Daniel Vetter
2013-03-26 14:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-26 19:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-03-27 0:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-27 0:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-26 22:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Damien Lespiau
2013-03-26 22:50 ` Damien Lespiau
2013-03-27 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2013-03-27 0:20 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130326125742.1aa431a9d406bc53159f27dc@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.