All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ncpfs: fix rmdir returns Device or resource busy
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:01:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613020122.GA20274@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130607161452.GI13110@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:14:52PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:09:05AM -0500, Dave Chiluk wrote:
> > Can't you just use the patch from my original e-mail?  Anyhow I attached
> > it an already signed-off patch.
> > 
> > Al Viro Can you integrate it now?
> 
> Applied...  FWIW, patch directly in mail body is more convenient to deal with.

Actually, looking at that stuff...  Why are we bothering with -EBUSY for
removal of busy directories on ncpfs, anyway?  It's not just rmdir(), it's
overwriting rename() as well.  IS_DEADDIR checks in fs/namei.c and fs/readdir.c
mean that the only method of ncpfs directories that might get called after
successful removal is ->setattr() and it would be trivial to add the check
in ncp_notify_change() that would make it fail for dead directories without
bothering the server at all...

Related question: what happens if you open / unlink / fchmod on ncpfs?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-28 22:50 [PATCH] ncpfs: fix rmdir returns Device or resource busy Dave Chiluk
2013-05-31 21:40 ` Dave Chiluk
     [not found]   ` <CA+i2_De5HHw2H9SvZ=W+QAOcy0M7jFac88OK6aeYdJVCGL6b+A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-05 20:20     ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-07  6:43       ` Petr Vandrovec
2013-06-07 16:09         ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-07 16:14           ` Al Viro
2013-06-13  2:01             ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-06-13  6:42               ` Al Viro
2013-06-14  4:19                 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-15  5:09                   ` Al Viro
2013-06-15  5:26                     ` Al Viro
2013-06-14  4:02               ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-19  9:30 ` Luis Henriques
2013-06-26  1:05   ` Ben Hutchings
2014-10-10 14:23 [PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix data corruption when blocksize < pagesize for mmapped data Jan Kara
2014-10-10 14:23 ` [PATCH] ncpfs: fix rmdir returns Device or resource busy Jan Kara
2014-10-10 14:23   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130613020122.GA20274@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=chiluk@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petr@vandrovec.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.