All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:53:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140211205340.GY3891@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392150042-18837-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:20:42PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> With the ring mask we now have an easy way to know the number of rings
> in the system, and therefore can accurately predict the number of dwords
> to emit for semaphore signalling. This was not possible (easily)
> previously.
> 
> There should be no functional impact, simply fewer instructions emitted.
> 
> While we're here, simply do the round up to 2 instead of the fancier
> rounding we did before, which rounding up per mbox, ie 4. This also
> allows us to drop the unnecessary MI_NOOP, so not really 4, 3.
> 
> v2: Use 3 dwords instead of 4 (Ville)
> Do the proper calculation to get the number of dwords to emit (Ville)
> Conditionally set .sync_to when semaphores are enabled (Ville)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>

Yeah looks OK now. Well, assuming we don't keep going when we fail to
init one or more rings, because in that case the loop would fail to emit
all the dwords it was supposed to.

IIRC the rest of the patches looked good up to 05/11. So for patches
01-05:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 70f7190..483684f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -635,24 +635,19 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>  static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
>  		       unsigned int num_dwords)
>  {
> +#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 3
>  	struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct intel_ring_buffer *useless;
> -	int i, ret;
> +	int i, ret, num_rings;
>  
> -	/* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying
> -	 * number of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update
> -	 * to a multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of
> -	 * 2) even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords.
> -	 */
> -#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4
> -	if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev))
> -		num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS);
> +	num_rings = hweight_long(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask);
> +	num_dwords += round_up((num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS, 2);
> +#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
>  
>  	ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
>  
>  	for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
>  		u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.signal_mbox[i];
> @@ -660,15 +655,13 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
>  			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
>  			intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg);
>  			intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
> -			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
> -		} else {
> -			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
> -			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
> -			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
> -			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/* If num_dwords was rounded, make sure the tail pointer is correct */
> +	if (num_rings % 2 == 0)
> +		intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -686,7 +679,11 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = ring->semaphore.signal(ring, 4);
> +	if (ring->semaphore.signal)
> +		ret = ring->semaphore.signal(ring, 4);
> +	else
> +		ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
> +
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -1880,8 +1877,10 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT;
>  		ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno;
>  		ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno;
> -		ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> -		ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +		if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) {
> +			ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> +			ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +		}
>  		ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
>  		ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV;
>  		ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB;
> @@ -2057,8 +2056,10 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>  			ring->dispatch_execbuffer =
>  				gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
>  		}
> -		ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> -		ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +		if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) {
> +			ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> +			ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +		}
>  		ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR;
>  		ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
>  		ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB;
> @@ -2115,8 +2116,10 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq;
>  		ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
>  	}
> -	ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> -	ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +	if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +		ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> +	}
>  	ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR;
>  	ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV;
>  	ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
> @@ -2157,8 +2160,10 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		ring->irq_put = hsw_vebox_put_irq;
>  		ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
>  	}
> -	ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> -	ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +	if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> +		ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> +	}
>  	ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER;
>  	ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV;
>  	ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB;
> -- 
> 1.8.5.4

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-29 19:55 [PATCH 00/13] [REPOST] Broadwell HW semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 11:25   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-11 16:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 17:13       ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-11 20:20   ` [PATCH] [v2] " Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 20:53     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-02-11 21:50       ` Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 12:38   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-30 12:46     ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-30 13:18       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-30 13:25         ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-30 13:35         ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-11 21:48           ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 22:23             ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-11 22:25               ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 22:28                 ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-11 22:11     ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 22:22       ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-11 23:01         ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-12  9:29           ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 12:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 13:26   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky
2014-01-30 14:53   ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-01-30 14:58     ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-12  0:19       ` Ben Widawsky
2014-02-12  0:23     ` Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 Ben Widawsky
2014-01-29 19:55 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140211205340.GY3891@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.