Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid() - Russell King

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:20:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150226092007.GK8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1712883.jTy2B8DxIY@avalon>

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:52:02AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On Friday 16 January 2015 17:47:34 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:37:43PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Replace the internal EDID read implementation by a call to the new EDID
> > > read core function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > > Tested-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> > 
> > Thanks, committed, and updated the summary line to:
> > 
> > "drm/i2c: tda998x: use drm_do_get_edid()"
> > 
> > to match the style used in the past.
> 
> I can't see the patch in Dave's -next branch, has it been lost somewhere ?

I thought I had sent a pull request before the last merge window, but
it seems I didn't.  That's the problem when you end up carrying too many
patches... tracking what's been sent and to whom is a real pain.  The
only time I get to verify what's been sent is after it's appeared in
mainline (so after a merge window).

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel