All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 02:04:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105010430.GA6567@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105105507.335a4fae@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 798 bytes --]

Stephen,

> > After merging the i2c tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:

Oops, yes.

> >  /* Bus timings (in ns) for bit-banging */
> > -static struct i2c_timings {
> > +static struct ibm_i2c_timings {

I changed it to ibm_iic_timings for consistency reasons...

> >  	volatile struct iic_regs __iomem *iic = dev->vaddr;
> > -	const struct i2c_timings* t = &timings[dev->fast_mode ? 1 : 0];
> > +	const struct ibm_i2c_timings* t = &timings[dev->fast_mode ? 1 : 0];

... and fixed the placement of the * operator ...

> >  	u8 mask, v, sda;
> >  	int i, res;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.6.2
> 
> Ping?

... and applied to for-next, thanks! The patch got lost because the
i2c-list was not on CC and thus patchwork couldn't catch it.


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-16  4:48 linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-04 23:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-05  1:04   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-04  0:20 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-04  6:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-10-05 23:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-01  0:32 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-01  0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-01  8:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-06-01  8:55   ` Wolfram Sang
2021-06-01  9:09   ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-06-01  9:09     ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-06-01  9:21     ` Wolfram Sang
2021-06-01  9:21       ` Wolfram Sang
2017-11-28  0:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-28  9:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-06-26  1:09 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-26  2:04 ` Shawn Guo
2015-08-25  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-26  0:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-01-16  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-16  7:16 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-11-24  9:16 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-24  9:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-11-17 23:29 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-19  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-19  9:06 ` Jean Delvare
2010-06-21  2:03 Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-21  5:57 ` Jean Delvare
2010-06-21  7:09   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-01  2:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-01 10:43 ` Jean Delvare
2010-03-02  0:31   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160105010430.GA6567@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.