From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Skylake PSys support
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:59:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420135945.GY3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460930581-29748-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 03:02:59PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Skylake processor supports a new set of RAPL registers for controlling
> entire SoC instead of just CPU package called PSys. This change adds
> support in two sub systems:
>
> x86/perf: Adds basic support for Skylake RAPL and PSys support
>
> powercap/rapl: A new platform domain to the current power capping Intel
> RAPL driver.
> Srinivas Pandruvada (2):
> perf/x86/intel/rapl: support Skylake RAPL domains
> powercap: intel_rapl: PSys support
>
> arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 2 ++
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
These two patches depend on one another, right? Because the first patch
adds the MSR the second patch uses?
How should we go about merging this? The perf-rapl stuff normally goes
through tip while the powercap stuff goes through Rafael's tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 22:02 [PATCH v4 0/2] Skylake PSys support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] perf/x86/intel/rapl: support Skylake RAPL domains Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 15:54 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-23 12:55 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Support " tip-bot for Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] powercap: intel_rapl: PSys support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-28 10:26 ` [tip:perf/core] powercap, perf/x86/intel/rapl: Add " tip-bot for Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-20 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Skylake " Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-21 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-21 14:48 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160420135945.GY3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.