All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, vegard.nossum@oracle.com, sterba@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: add valid checks for chunk loading
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:36:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160503233625.GG21008@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42231399-bac4-1c41-bb43-f2c7b4d1a0a0@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:12:01AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> Liu Bo wrote on 2016/05/02 11:15 -0700:
> >To prevent fuzz filesystem images from panic the whole system,
> >we need various validation checks to refuse to mount such an image
> >if btrfs finds any invalid value during loading chunks, including
> >both sys_array and regular chunks.
> >
> >Note that these checks may not be sufficient to cover all corner cases,
> >feel free to add more checks.
> 
> Looks good for me.
> 
> But would you mind to do extra check on some minor members like owner,
> io_align, io_width and sub_stripes?
> Since we have a dedicated function now, if not too hard, it's never a bad
> idea to check every member for best robust.

OK.

> 
> Especially sub_stripes, as it seems to be used by division in
> btrfs_rmap_block().

It makes sense to check sub_stripes, but io_align/width are not used at
this moment, I'd leave it for the future.

What do you think?

Thanks,

-liubo

> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
> >
> >Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
> >Reported-by: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> >---
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >index bd0f45f..1075573 100644
> >--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >@@ -6206,27 +6206,23 @@ struct btrfs_device *btrfs_alloc_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > 	return dev;
> > }
> >
> >-static int read_one_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *key,
> >-			  struct extent_buffer *leaf,
> >-			  struct btrfs_chunk *chunk)
> >+/* Return -EIO if any error, otherwise return 0. */
> >+static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_root *root,
> >+				   struct extent_buffer *leaf,
> >+				   struct btrfs_chunk *chunk, u64 logical)
> > {
> >-	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &root->fs_info->mapping_tree;
> >-	struct map_lookup *map;
> >-	struct extent_map *em;
> >-	u64 logical;
> > 	u64 length;
> > 	u64 stripe_len;
> >-	u64 devid;
> >-	u8 uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
> >-	int num_stripes;
> >-	int ret;
> >-	int i;
> >+	u16 num_stripes;
> >+	u16 sub_stripes;
> >+	u64 type;
> >
> >-	logical = key->offset;
> > 	length = btrfs_chunk_length(leaf, chunk);
> > 	stripe_len = btrfs_chunk_stripe_len(leaf, chunk);
> > 	num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(leaf, chunk);
> >-	/* Validation check */
> >+	sub_stripes = btrfs_chunk_sub_stripes(leaf, chunk);
> >+	type = btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk);
> >+
> > 	if (!num_stripes) {
> > 		btrfs_err(root->fs_info, "invalid chunk num_stripes: %u",
> > 			  num_stripes);
> >@@ -6237,24 +6233,70 @@ static int read_one_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *key,
> > 			  "invalid chunk logical %llu", logical);
> > 		return -EIO;
> > 	}
> >+	if (btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk) != root->sectorsize) {
> >+		btrfs_err(root->fs_info, "invalid chunk sectorsize %llu",
> >+			  (unsigned long long)btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf,
> >+								      chunk));
> >+		return -EIO;
> >+	}
> > 	if (!length || !IS_ALIGNED(length, root->sectorsize)) {
> > 		btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
> > 			"invalid chunk length %llu", length);
> > 		return -EIO;
> > 	}
> >-	if (!is_power_of_2(stripe_len)) {
> >+	if (stripe_len != BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) {
> > 		btrfs_err(root->fs_info, "invalid chunk stripe length: %llu",
> > 			  stripe_len);
> > 		return -EIO;
> > 	}
> > 	if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
> >-	    btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk)) {
> >+	    type) {
> > 		btrfs_err(root->fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: %llu",
> > 			  ~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK |
> > 			    BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
> > 			  btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
> > 		return -EIO;
> > 	}
> >+	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 && sub_stripes == 0) ||
> >+	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 && num_stripes < 1) ||
> >+	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 && num_stripes < 2) ||
> >+	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 && num_stripes < 3) ||
> >+	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP && num_stripes > 2) ||
> >+	    ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 &&
> >+	     num_stripes != 1)) {
> >+		btrfs_err(root->fs_info, "Invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu",
> >+			  num_stripes, sub_stripes,
> >+			  type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK);
> >+		return -EIO;
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	return 0;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int read_one_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *key,
> >+			  struct extent_buffer *leaf,
> >+			  struct btrfs_chunk *chunk)
> >+{
> >+	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &root->fs_info->mapping_tree;
> >+	struct map_lookup *map;
> >+	struct extent_map *em;
> >+	u64 logical;
> >+	u64 length;
> >+	u64 stripe_len;
> >+	u64 devid;
> >+	u8 uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
> >+	int num_stripes;
> >+	int ret;
> >+	int i;
> >+
> >+	logical = key->offset;
> >+	length = btrfs_chunk_length(leaf, chunk);
> >+	stripe_len = btrfs_chunk_stripe_len(leaf, chunk);
> >+	num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(leaf, chunk);
> >+	/* Validation check */
> >+	ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(root, leaf, chunk, logical);
> >+	if (ret)
> >+		return ret;
> >
> > 	read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
> > 	em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, logical, 1);
> >@@ -6502,6 +6544,7 @@ int btrfs_read_sys_array(struct btrfs_root *root)
> > 	u32 array_size;
> > 	u32 len = 0;
> > 	u32 cur_offset;
> >+	u64 type;
> > 	struct btrfs_key key;
> >
> > 	ASSERT(BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE <= root->nodesize);
> >@@ -6568,6 +6611,15 @@ int btrfs_read_sys_array(struct btrfs_root *root)
> > 				break;
> > 			}
> >
> >+			type = btrfs_chunk_type(sb, chunk);
> >+			if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) == 0) {
> >+				printk(KERN_ERR
> >+	    "BTRFS: invalid chunk type %llu in sys_array at offset %u\n",
> >+					type, cur_offset);
> >+				ret = -EIO;
> >+				break;
> >+			}
> >+
> > 			len = btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes);
> > 			if (cur_offset + len > array_size)
> > 				goto out_short_read;
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-03 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-02 18:15 [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: add more valid checks for superblock Liu Bo
2016-05-02 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: add valid checks for chunk loading Liu Bo
2016-05-03  1:12   ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-03 23:36     ` Liu Bo [this message]
2016-05-05  1:03       ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-03  5:53   ` Anand Jain
2016-05-03 23:33     ` Liu Bo
2016-05-04 13:56   ` David Sterba
2016-05-13 23:57     ` Liu Bo
2016-05-17 13:37       ` David Sterba
2016-05-02 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: add more valid checks for superblock Liu Bo
2016-05-03  1:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-03 23:32   ` Liu Bo
2016-05-04 13:23   ` David Sterba
2016-05-04 17:44     ` Liu Bo
2016-05-05  1:08       ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-06 14:35         ` David Sterba
2016-05-09  1:31           ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-13 18:14             ` Liu Bo
2016-05-13 23:42               ` Qu Wenruo
2016-05-17 13:47                 ` David Sterba
2016-05-04 13:29 ` David Sterba
2016-05-04 17:40   ` Liu Bo
2016-05-06 14:39     ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160503233625.GG21008@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sterba@suse.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.