Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm: Turn off crtc before tearing down its data structure

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas-JFq808J9C/izQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	Nouveau Dev
	<nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
	intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	dri-devel
	<dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm: Turn off crtc before tearing down its data structure
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:36:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601123641.GA15243@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGFb9ihRtjeK7s0ezPPv-C6S9GKbE4h9MLoPyHyN=9W5Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:43:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:30:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:03:27PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> >> > When a drm_crtc structure is destroyed with drm_crtc_cleanup(), the DRM
> >> > core does not turn off the crtc first and neither do the drivers. With
> >> > nouveau, radeon and amdgpu, this causes a runtime pm ref to be leaked on
> >> > driver unload if at least one crtc was enabled.
> >> >
> >> > (See usage of have_disp_power_ref in nouveau_crtc_set_config(),
> >> > radeon_crtc_set_config() and amdgpu_crtc_set_config()).
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: 5addcf0a5f0f ("nouveau: add runtime PM support (v0.9)")
> >> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> >> > Tested-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> >>
> >> This is a core regression, we fixed it again. Previously when unreference
> >> drm_planes the core made sure that it's not longer in use, which had the
> >> side effect of shutting everything off in module unload.
> >>
> >> For a bunch of reasons we've stopped doing that, but that turned out to be
> >> a mistake. It's fixed since
> >>
> >> commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140
> >> Author: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >> Date:   Wed May 4 14:38:26 2016 +0200
> >>
> >>     drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4.
> >>
> >> Your patch shouldn't be needed with that any more. If it still is it's
> >> most likely the fbdev cleanup done too late, but you /should/ get a big
> >> WARNING splat in that case from drm_mode_config_cleanup().
> >
> > I tested it and at least with nouveau, the above-mentioned commit does
> > *not* solve the issue, so patch [9/9] of this series is still needed.
> > I do not get a WARN splat when unloading nouveau.
> 
> With legacy kms the only way to keep a crtc enabled is to display a
> drm_framebuffer on it. And drm_mode_config_cleanup has a WARN_ON if
> framebuffers are left behind. There's a bunch of options:
> - nouveau somehow manages to keep the crtc on without a framebuffer
> - nouveau somehow leaks a drm_framebuffer, but removes it from the fb_list
> - something else

Found it. nouveau_fbcon_destroy() doesn't call drm_framebuffer_remove().
If I add that, the crtc gets properly disabled on unload.

It does call drm_framebuffer_cleanup(). That's why there was no WARN,
drm_mode_config_cleanup() only WARNs if a framebuffer was left on the
mode_config.fb_list.

radeon and amdgpu have the same problem. In fact there are very few
drivers that call drm_framebuffer_remove(): tegra, msm, exynos, omapdrm
and i915 (since Imre Deak's 9d6612516da0).

Should we add a WARN to prevent this? How about WARN_ON(crtc->enabled)
in drm_crtc_cleanup()?

Also, i915 calls drm_framebuffer_unregister_private() before it calls
drm_framebuffer_remove(). This ordering has the unfortunate side effect
that the drm_framebuffer has ID 0 in log messages emitted by
drm_framebuffer_remove():

[   39.680874] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 0 (3)
[   39.680878] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 0 (2)
[   39.680884] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 0 (1)

Best regards,

Lukas

> 
> There's still no need to forcefully shut down crtc at cleanup time in
> the core, this is still a driver bug. So yes your patch might be
> needed, but it's not the right fix.
> -Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau