All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PCI/PCIe: make DPC explicitly non-modular
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:28:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728212801.GY11410@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160728202859.GA2420@localhost.localdomain>

[Re: [PATCH -next] PCI/PCIe: make DPC explicitly non-modular] On 28/07/2016 (Thu 16:29) Keith Busch wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:33:03PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> > 
> > drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig:config PCIE_DPC
> > drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig:       bool "PCIe Downstream Port Containment support"
> > 
> > ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> > 
> > Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> > when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
> > 
> > Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular
> > case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit.
> > 
> > We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
> > was (or is now) contained at the top of the file in the comments.
> 
> Thanks for cleaning this up.
> 
> FWIW, all of the other pcie service drivers look like they could use
> the same cleanup.

Yep, not to worry, I've still got the following patches pending for-4.9:

$ grep PCI series 
# PCI
PCI-aerdrv-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-altera-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-dra7xx-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-imx6-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-pme-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-qcom-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-spear13xx-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-xilinx-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-xilinx-nwl-make-it-eplicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-portdrv-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-PCIe-make-dpc-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-generic-make-host-common-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-hotplug_core-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
PCI-hotplug-make-core-code-explicitly-non-modular.patch

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-28 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-28 19:33 [PATCH -next] PCI/PCIe: make DPC explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-28 20:29 ` Keith Busch
2016-07-28 21:28   ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2016-08-22 19:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-22 22:12       ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160728212801.GY11410@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.