Re: [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code

From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:36:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161124143632.GG23528@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5837085C0200007800121BF7@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:33:48AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.11.16 at 15:19, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 24/11/16 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> > 
> > There is an opposite problem on the Intel side, delivering some #UD with
> > an error code (although the guest behaviour does appear to be correct,
> > so perhaps hardware swallows it).  I will do a companion fix.
> 
> Oh - I did go through and checked the #GP-s, but didn't think of
> also checking the other way around.
> 
> > As this interacts with my 191 series, shall I put this patch into my
> > series and rebase properly over it.
> 
> Well, I would hope for the one here to still go in for 4.8, whereas
> your series is targeting 4.9 only aiui.

Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

Please apply this by Friday, otherwise it needs to be backported.

> 
> Jan
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel