All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: preserve native TSC speed during migration between identical hosts
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:27:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530092705.GC26792@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524153315.GO18530@char.us.oracle.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]

On Wed, May 24, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

> Is there some form of tests that they can run to verify and test
> that this is safe? Or perhaps this is something that is based on the kernel
> versions? Like 4.11 are safe, but 3.18 is not?

I'm not sure why you are asking for specific kernel versions.


But the test is simply to boot a HVM domU with 'tsc_mode=native' and
migrate it to a similar dom0. This fails with 3.12 and 4.4 based domU
kernels, with xen-4.7 as dom0. This pretty much ruins the plan.

So far I have not investigated why the domU on the remote side does not
get any cpu time, or why it makes no progress. But in the end the I
think only a hardware upgrade to TSC-scaling capable CPUs will avoid the
performance penalty due to the TSC emulation.
I do not have access to such hardware to verify it.


Olaf

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-30  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-24 14:25 [PATCH] xen: preserve native TSC speed during migration between identical hosts Olaf Hering
2017-05-24 15:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-05-24 15:25   ` Olaf Hering
2017-05-24 15:33     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-05-24 15:44       ` Olaf Hering
2017-05-29 14:45       ` Jan Beulich
2017-05-30  6:36         ` Olaf Hering
2017-05-30  7:25           ` Jan Beulich
2017-05-30  9:27       ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2017-05-30 14:28         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-05-29 14:50 ` Jan Beulich
2017-05-30  6:41   ` Olaf Hering
2017-05-30  7:27     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170530092705.GC26792@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.