All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [4.14-rc1 bug] fstests generic/441 failure on ext2
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:12:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920111221.GA11106@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505833751.28765.5.camel@redhat.com>

On Tue 19-09-17 11:09:11, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:57 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 18-09-17 08:10:24, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 19:23 +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > With ext2 driven by ext4 module (or ext4 without journal, I haven't
> > > > tested ext2 module, but I guess the result is the same), v4.14-rc1
> > > > kernel starts to fail fstests generic/441 as:
> > > > 
> > > > +First fsync after reopen of fd[0] failed: Input/output error
> > > > 
> > > > git bisect shows that this is uncovered by commit ffb959bbdf92 ("mm:
> > > > remove optimizations based on i_size in mapping writeback waits"), which
> > > > removed (i_size == 0) check in filemap_fdatawait().
> > > > 
> > > > I say "uncovered" because test fails with 4.13 kernel too if we re-open
> > > > the test file without O_TRUNC flag in src/fsync-err.c (so file size is
> > > > not zero, and fails the i_size == 0 check).
> > > > 
> > > > The EIO was returned by sync_inode_metadata() in __generic_file_fsync(),
> > > > the call trace is like:
> > > > 
> > > > do_fsync
> > > >  vfs_fsync_range
> > > >   ext4_sync_file
> > > >    __generic_file_fsync
> > > >     sync_inode_metadata
> > > >      writeback_single_inode
> > > >       __writeback_single_inode
> > > >        filemap_fdatawait  => EIO here
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Eryu
> > > 
> > > (cc'ing Jan and linux-fsdevel)
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the bug report. The analysis looks spot-on.
> > > 
> > > So yeah...we have this "legacy" filemap_fdatawait call in
> > > __writeback_single_inode, and that is returning -EIO, likely because
> > > AS_EIO was set on the inode from the earlier wb errors.
> > > 
> > > That error return is pretty sketchy since it could be cleared at any
> > > time, and pretty much everything we care about here is now using
> > > errseq_t for error reporting at fsync. I don't think we really care too
> > > much about that flag in this codepath anymore.
> > 
> > So I agree fsync(2) path is covered but that fdatawait() call is also
> > responsible for reporting error e.g. for write_inode_now() calls and there
> > we still have some unconverted users. So for now I don't have a better
> > solution than to live with this additional somewhat stale EIO error. Or
> > possibly we can have truncate to 0 clear writeback error which would mask
> > the problem again and kind of makes sense...
> > 
> > 
> 
> Another thought would be to have file_check_and_advance_wb_err (and
> maybe filemap_check_wb_err) also clear AS_EIO and AS_ENOSPC. That sort
> of makes sense since legacy users would have cleared those flags.
> 
> I had a patch that did that at one point, but dropped it since it didn't
> seem necessary. That might be the best fix for this though.

Yeah, that would be also a workable option.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-20 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-18 11:23 [4.14-rc1 bug] fstests generic/441 failure on ext2 Eryu Guan
2017-09-18 12:10 ` Jeff Layton
2017-09-19 14:57   ` Jan Kara
2017-09-19 15:09     ` Jeff Layton
2017-09-20 11:12       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-09-22 13:33 ` [PATCH] mm: have filemap_check_and_advance_wb_err clear AS_EIO/AS_ENOSPC Jeff Layton
2017-09-25  8:17   ` Jan Kara
2017-09-25 19:53   ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170920111221.GA11106@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.