All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfsprogs: fix wrong variable type in write_once function
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 00:22:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171111162231.GY21475@dhcp12-143.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96daff60-b086-ef36-2cbf-0b21d01d42b6@sandeen.net>

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 09:46:48AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 11/11/17 7:57 AM, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > The 'Coverity Scan' found a problem in new write_once() function:
> > 
> > 272             size_t bytes;
> > 273             bytes = do_pwrite(file->fd, offset, count, count, pwritev2_flags);
> >>>>     CID 1420710:  Control flow issues  (NO_EFFECT)
> >>>>     This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "bytes < 0UL".
> > 274             if (bytes < 0)
> > 275                     return -1;
> > 
> > That's unreasonable. do_pwrite return 'ssize_t' type value, which can
> > be less than zero, but we use a 'size_t' to get the return value. So
> > change the size_t to ssize_t for it can store the return value
> > correctly.
> > 
> > By the chance, correct all 'ssize_t' type problems in pwrite related
> > functions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > V2 changed more than V1, as below:
> > 1) The return value type of do_pwritev and do_pwrite, from 'int' to 'ssize_t'
> > 2) The arguments type of do_pwritev and do_pwrite, from 'ssize_t' to 'size_t'
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> > 
> >  io/pwrite.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/io/pwrite.c b/io/pwrite.c
> > index 26f79579..3df976a8 100644
> > --- a/io/pwrite.c
> > +++ b/io/pwrite.c
> > @@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ pwrite_help(void)
> >  }
> >  
> >  #ifdef HAVE_PWRITEV
> > -static int
> > +static ssize_t
> >  do_pwritev(
> >  	int		fd,
> >  	off64_t		offset,
> > -	ssize_t		count,
> > -	ssize_t		buffer_size,
> > +	size_t		count,
> > +	size_t		buffer_size,
> 
> I had not noticed this before, but this is odd; buffer_size is not used
> in this function. Instead, we test the global "buffersize"
> 
> I'm not sure what's going on there, need to read the code bit more.
> That's probably a separate fix though.

The buffer_size argument in do_pwritev/do_preadv is useless. I'll remove
it in a separate patch. But due to this patch changed the 'buffer_size'
place, I'll send this patch and 'remove buffer_size' patch together.
To prevent merge conflict.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> I think the rest looks ok,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> 
> 
> 
> >  	int 		pwritev2_flags)
> >  {
> >  	int vecs = 0;
> > @@ -105,12 +105,12 @@ do_pwritev(
> >  #define do_pwritev(fd, offset, count, buffer_size) (0)
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -static int
> > +static ssize_t
> >  do_pwrite(
> >  	int		fd,
> >  	off64_t		offset,
> > -	ssize_t		count,
> > -	ssize_t		buffer_size,
> > +	size_t		count,
> > +	size_t		buffer_size,
> >  	int		pwritev2_flags)
> >  {
> >  	if (!vectors)
> > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ write_once(
> >  	long long	*total,
> >  	int		pwritev2_flags)
> >  {
> > -	size_t bytes;
> > +	ssize_t bytes;
> >  	bytes = do_pwrite(file->fd, offset, count, count, pwritev2_flags);
> >  	if (bytes < 0)
> >  		return -1;
> 
> > 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-11 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-11 13:57 [PATCH v2] xfsprogs: fix wrong variable type in write_once function Zorro Lang
2017-11-11 15:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-11-11 16:22   ` Zorro Lang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171111162231.GY21475@dhcp12-143.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=zlang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.