Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: adc: ina2xx: Use a monotonic clock for delay calculation

From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Stefan Brüns" <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Maciej Purski <m.purski@samsung.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: adc: ina2xx: Use a monotonic clock for delay calculation
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 17:48:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171229174806.5a615b63@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b91d1c8c-2467-44bc-b8bc-adc74dfb9bee@rwthex-w2-a.rwth-ad.de>

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 19:31:36 +0100
Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:

> The iio timestamp clock is user selectable and may be non-monotonic. Also,
> only part of the acquisition time is measured, thus the delay was longer
> than intended.
> 
> Use a monotonic timestamp to track the time for the next poll iteration.
> The timestamp is advanced by the sampling interval each iteration. In case
> the conversion overrruns the register readout (i.e. fast sampling combined
> with a slow bus), one or multiple samples will be dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - add a comment mentioning skipping samples on overrun
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> index 2621a34ee5c6..415e53b5c0a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -703,10 +703,10 @@ static int ina2xx_work_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	/* data buffer needs space for channel data and timestap */
>  	unsigned short data[4 + sizeof(s64)/sizeof(short)];
>  	int bit, ret, i = 0;
> -	s64 time_a, time_b;
> +	s64 time;
>  	unsigned int alert;
>  
> -	time_a = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> +	time = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Because the timer thread and the chip conversion clock
> @@ -752,11 +752,9 @@ static int ina2xx_work_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  		data[i++] = val;
>  	}
>  
> -	time_b = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> +	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, time);
>  
> -	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, time_a);
> -
> -	return (unsigned long)(time_b - time_a) / 1000;
> +	return 0;
>  };
>  
>  static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *data)
> @@ -764,7 +762,9 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *data)
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = data;
>  	struct ina2xx_chip_info *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	int sampling_us = SAMPLING_PERIOD(chip);
> -	int buffer_us, delay_us;
> +	int ret;
> +	struct timespec64 next, now, delta;
> +	s64 delay_us;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Poll a bit faster than the chip internal Fs, in case
> @@ -773,15 +773,28 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *data)
>  	if (!chip->allow_async_readout)
>  		sampling_us -= 200;
>  
> +	ktime_get_ts64(&next);
> +
>  	do {
> -		buffer_us = ina2xx_work_buffer(indio_dev);
> -		if (buffer_us < 0)
> -			return buffer_us;
> +		ret = ina2xx_work_buffer(indio_dev);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
>  
> -		if (sampling_us > buffer_us) {
> -			delay_us = sampling_us - buffer_us;
> -			usleep_range(delay_us, (delay_us * 3) >> 1);
> -		}
> +		ktime_get_ts64(&now);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Advance the timestamp for the next poll by one sampling
> +		 * interval, and sleep for the remainder (next - now).
> +		 * In case "next" has already passed, the interval is added
> +		 * multiple times, i.e. samples are dropped.
> +		 */
> +		do {
> +			timespec64_add_ns(&next, 1000 * sampling_us);
> +			delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
> +			delay_us = timespec64_to_ns(&delta) / 1000;
> +		} while (delay_us <= 0);
> +
> +		usleep_range(delay_us, (delay_us * 3) >> 1);
>  
>  	} while (!kthread_should_stop());
>