[PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Reduce spinlock hold time during notify_ring() interrupt

From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Reduce spinlock hold time during notify_ring() interrupt
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:24:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115212455.24046-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115212455.24046-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

By taking advantage of the RCU protection of the task struct, we can find
the appropriate signaler under the spinlock and then release the spinlock
before waking the task and signaling the fence.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 3517c6548e2c..0b272501b738 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1065,21 +1065,24 @@ static void ironlake_rps_change_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
+	const u32 seqno = intel_engine_get_seqno(engine);
 	struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq = NULL;
+	struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
 	struct intel_wait *wait;
 
-	if (!engine->breadcrumbs.irq_armed)
+	if (unlikely(!engine->breadcrumbs.irq_armed))
 		return;
 
 	atomic_inc(&engine->irq_count);
 	set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	spin_lock(&engine->breadcrumbs.irq_lock);
 	wait = engine->breadcrumbs.irq_wait;
 	if (wait) {
-		bool wakeup = engine->irq_seqno_barrier;
-
-		/* We use a callback from the dma-fence to submit
+		/*
+		 * We use a callback from the dma-fence to submit
 		 * requests after waiting on our own requests. To
 		 * ensure minimum delay in queuing the next request to
 		 * hardware, signal the fence now rather than wait for
@@ -1090,19 +1093,20 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		 * and to handle coalescing of multiple seqno updates
 		 * and many waiters.
 		 */
-		if (i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
-				      wait->seqno)) {
+		if (i915_seqno_passed(seqno, wait->seqno)) {
 			struct drm_i915_gem_request *waiter = wait->request;
 
-			wakeup = true;
 			if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
 				      &waiter->fence.flags) &&
 			    intel_wait_check_request(wait, waiter))
 				rq = i915_gem_request_get(waiter);
-		}
 
-		if (wakeup)
-			wake_up_process(wait->tsk);
+			tsk = wait->tsk;
+		} else {
+			if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier &&
+			    i915_seqno_passed(seqno, wait->seqno - 1))
+				tsk = wait->tsk;
+		}
 	} else {
 		if (engine->breadcrumbs.irq_armed)
 			__intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(engine);
@@ -1114,6 +1118,11 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		i915_gem_request_put(rq);
 	}
 
+	if (tsk && tsk->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+		wake_up_process(tsk);
+
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	trace_intel_engine_notify(engine, wait);
 }
 
-- 
2.15.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
