[PATCH 2/3] btrfs: Use btrfs_mark_bg_unused() to replace open code

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: Use btrfs_mark_bg_unused() to replace open code
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 14:58:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180528065844.21248-3-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180528065844.21248-1-wqu@suse.com>

Introduce a small helper, btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), to accquire needed
locks and add a block group to unused_bgs list.

No functional modification, and only 3 callers are involved.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |  1 +
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c       |  9 +--------
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 2771cc56a622..b19b673485fd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -2829,6 +2829,7 @@ void check_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const u64 type);
 u64 add_new_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
 		       struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 start, u64 end);
+void btrfs_mark_bg_unused(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *bg);
 
 /* ctree.c */
 int btrfs_bin_search(struct extent_buffer *eb, const struct btrfs_key *key,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 8241de81089a..f0d7e19feca7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6350,16 +6350,8 @@ static int update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		 * dirty list to avoid races between cleaner kthread and space
 		 * cache writeout.
 		 */
-		if (!alloc && old_val == 0) {
-			spin_lock(&info->unused_bgs_lock);
-			if (list_empty(&cache->bg_list)) {
-				btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
-				trace_btrfs_add_unused_block_group(cache);
-				list_add_tail(&cache->bg_list,
-					      &info->unused_bgs);
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&info->unused_bgs_lock);
-		}
+		if (!alloc && old_val == 0)
+			btrfs_mark_bg_unused(cache);
 
 		btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
 		total -= num_bytes;
@@ -10201,15 +10193,8 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 		if (btrfs_chunk_readonly(info, cache->key.objectid)) {
 			inc_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
 		} else if (btrfs_block_group_used(&cache->item) == 0) {
-			spin_lock(&info->unused_bgs_lock);
-			/* Should always be true but just in case. */
-			if (list_empty(&cache->bg_list)) {
-				btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
-				trace_btrfs_add_unused_block_group(cache);
-				list_add_tail(&cache->bg_list,
-					      &info->unused_bgs);
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&info->unused_bgs_lock);
+			ASSERT(list_empty(&cache->bg_list));
+			btrfs_mark_bg_unused(cache);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -11133,3 +11118,16 @@ void btrfs_wait_for_snapshot_creation(struct btrfs_root *root)
 			       !atomic_read(&root->will_be_snapshotted));
 	}
 }
+
+void btrfs_mark_bg_unused(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *bg)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
+
+	spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
+	if (list_empty(&bg->bg_list)) {
+		btrfs_get_block_group(bg);
+		trace_btrfs_add_unused_block_group(bg);
+		list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &fs_info->unused_bgs);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index a59005862010..40086b47a65f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -3981,14 +3981,7 @@ int scrub_enumerate_chunks(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 		if (!cache->removed && !cache->ro && cache->reserved == 0 &&
 		    btrfs_block_group_used(&cache->item) == 0) {
 			spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
-			spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
-			if (list_empty(&cache->bg_list)) {
-				btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
-				trace_btrfs_add_unused_block_group(cache);
-				list_add_tail(&cache->bg_list,
-					      &fs_info->unused_bgs);
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
+			btrfs_mark_bg_unused(cache);
 		} else {
 			spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
 		}
-- 
2.17.0

