Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Atwood, Matthew S" <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: "Navare, Manasi D" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:06:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719220656.GA2182@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc949f30af4bc12dbf2f28a7a57bd88906a50533.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Atwood, Matthew S wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 14:07 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:35:49PM -0700, matthew.s.atwood@intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > According to DP spec (2.9.3.1 of DP 1.4) if
> > > EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT is set the addresses in
> > > DPCD
> > > 02200h through 0220Fh shall contain the DPRX's true capability.
> > > These
> > > values will match 00000h through 0000Fh, except for DPCD_REV,
> > > MAX_LINK_RATE, DOWN_STREAM_PORT_PRESENT.
> > > 
> > > Read from DPCD once for all 3 values as this is an expensive
> > > operation.
> > > Spec mentions that all of address space 02200h through 0220Fh
> > > should
> > > contain the right information however currently only 3 values can
> > > differ.
> > > 
> > > There is no address space in the intel_dp->dpcd struct for
> > > addresses
> > > 02200h through 0220Fh, and since so much of the data is a
> > > identical,
> > > simply overwrite the values stored in 00000h through 0000Fh with
> > > the
> > > values that can be overwritten from addresses 02200h through
> > > 0220Fh.
> > > 
> > > This patch helps with backward compatibility for devices pre DP1.3.
> > > 
> > > v2: read only dpcd values which can be affected, remove incorrect
> > > check,
> > > split into drm include changes into separate patch, commit message,
> > > verbose debugging statements during overwrite.
> > > 
> > > v3: white space fixes
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 37
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index dde92e4af5d3..a31fbbbd7954 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -3738,6 +3738,43 @@ intel_dp_read_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  			     sizeof(intel_dp->dpcd)) < 0)
> > >  		return false; /* aux transfer failed */
> > >  
> > 
> > We never know what vendors can do with reserved bits. We should never
> > assume
> > they are zero. So we shouldn't do any of below unless it is newer
> > than DP 1.3.
> I think you mean newer than DP1.2?

yeap, sorry..

>= DP1.3

> > 
> > > +	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] &
> > > +	    DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT) {
> > > +		uint8_t dpcd_ext[6];
> > > +
> > > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: Extended Receiver Capability
> > > Field Present, accessing 02200h through 022FFh\n");
> > > +
> > > +		if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > DP_DP13_DPCD_REV,
> > > +				     &dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext))
> > > < 0)
> > > +			return false; /* aux transfer failed */
> > > +
> > > +		if (memcmp(&intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV],
> > > &dpcd_ext[DP_DPCD_REV],
> > > +			   sizeof(u8))) {
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: new value for DPCD
> > > Revision previous value %2x new value %2x\n",
> > > +				      intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV],
> > > +				      dpcd_ext[DP_DPCD_REV]);
> > > +			memcpy(&intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV],
> > > +			       &dpcd_ext[DP_DPCD_REV],
> > > +			       sizeof(u8));
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (memcmp(&intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE],
> > > +			   &dpcd_ext[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE],
> > > sizeof(u8))) {
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: new value for DPCD
> > > Max Link Rate previous value %2x new value %2x\n",
> > > +				      intel_dp-
> > > >dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE],
> > > +				      dpcd_ext[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE]);
> > > +			memcpy(&intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE],
> > > +			       &dpcd_ext[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE],
> > > sizeof(u8));
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (memcmp(&intel_dp-
> > > >dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT],
> > > +			   &dpcd_ext[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT],
> > > sizeof(u8))) {
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: new value for DPCD
> > > Downstream Port Present  previous value %2x new value %2x\n",
> > > +				      intel_dp-
> > > >dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT],
> > > +				      dpcd_ext[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_P
> > > RESENT]);
> > > +			memcpy(&intel_dp-
> > > >dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT],
> > > +			       &dpcd_ext[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT
> > > ],
> > > +			       sizeof(u8));
> > > +		}
> > > +	}
> > >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: %*ph\n", (int) sizeof(intel_dp-
> > > >dpcd), intel_dp->dpcd);
> > >  
> > >  	return intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] != 0;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel