All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Max Kirillov" <max@max630.net>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	"Jelmer Vernooij" <jelmer@jelmer.uk>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-backend: allow empty CONTENT_LENGTH
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 08:41:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180908054105.GC20545@jessie.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsh2ly6vw.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:49:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Max Kirillov <max@max630.net> writes:
> 
>> Actually, another reason for the latest issue was that CONTENT_LENGTH
>> is parsed for GET requests at all. It should be parsed only for POST
>> requests, or, rather, only for upoad-pack and receive-pack requests.
> 
> Not really.  The layered design of the HTTP protocol means that any
> request type can have non-empty body, but request types for which
> no semantics of the body is defined must ignore what is in the body,
> which in turn means we need to parse and pay attention to the
> content length etc. to find the end of the body, if only to ignore
> it.

I don't think it is git's job to police web server implementations,
especially considering that there is a gap between letter of RFC and
actual behavior.  Anyway, it only runs the check for "*/info/refs" GET
request, which ends up in get_info_refs(). Other GET requests do not
check CONTENT_LENGTH. Also, the version of service which is started from
get_info_refs() do not consume input (I think, actually, the
"--stateless-rpc" argument is not needed there).

> In any case, hopefully we can fix this before the final, as this is
> a regression introduced during this cycle?

Yes, I'm working on it.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-08  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <f12bc1d7-6acb-6ad9-2917-fbb09105f87a@debian.org>
     [not found] ` <20180905202613.GA20473@blodeuwedd>
2018-09-06  6:10   ` CONTENT_LENGTH can no longer be empty Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-06 19:35     ` [PATCH] http-backend: allow empty CONTENT_LENGTH Max Kirillov
2018-09-06 21:54       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-07  3:27         ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-07  3:38           ` Jeff King
2018-09-07  4:20             ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-07  4:59             ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-07  9:49               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-08  5:41                 ` Max Kirillov [this message]
2018-09-09  4:40                 ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-06 22:45       ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-07  3:36       ` [PATCH v2] " Max Kirillov
2018-09-08  0:19         ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-08  5:35           ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-08  5:42           ` [PATCH v3] " Max Kirillov
2018-09-10  5:17             ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-10 20:36               ` Max Kirillov
2018-09-11  4:06                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11 20:33                   ` [PATCH v2] http-backend test: make empty CONTENT_LENGTH test more realistic Max Kirillov
2018-09-09  4:10         ` [PATCH v4] http-backend: allow empty CONTENT_LENGTH Max Kirillov
2018-09-10  5:25           ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-10 13:17             ` Jeff King
2018-09-10 16:37               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-10 18:46                 ` Jeff King
2018-09-10 20:53             ` [PATCH] http-backend: Treat empty CONTENT_LENGTH as zero Max Kirillov
2018-09-10 21:22               ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11  1:55                 ` Jeff King
2018-09-11  2:20                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11  2:30                     ` Jeff King
2018-09-11  1:58               ` Jeff King
2018-09-11  3:42               ` [PATCH] http-backend: treat " Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11  4:03                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-11 18:15                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11 18:27                     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-12  5:56                     ` Jeff King
2018-09-12  6:26                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-12 16:10                       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11  4:18                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11  4:29                   ` Jonathan Nieder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180908054105.GC20545@jessie.local \
    --to=max@max630.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jelmer@jelmer.uk \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.