All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] blk-mq: fix dispatch from sw queue
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:16:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217111658.GA6341@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217111520.GD1329@ming.t460p>

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:15:21PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:08:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 06:42:47PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > When requst is added to rq list of sw queue(ctx), the rq may be from
> > > different hctx, after multi queue mapping is introduced.
> > > 
> > > So we have to put the request into one per-queue-type list inside
> > > sw queue, otherwise the request may be dispatched to wrong hw queue.
> > 
> > Hmm.  For one I don't think splitting the lock makes sense even for
> > split lists.
> > Second, do we really need different lists, or just take
> 
> It depends if the driver/existed blk-mq code can work well if one
> request is dispatched to wrong hctx.
> 
> > the type into account when dispatching from rq_list?  I'm not really
> 
> This way may be inefficient since the whole list has to be iterated once
> for finding all requests aimed to one specific hctx.

Then just update the changelog to make this clear, please!

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-17 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-17 10:42 [PATCH V2 0/4] blk-mq: queue mapping fix & improvement Ming Lei
2018-12-17 10:42 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] blk-mq: fix allocation for queue mapping table Ming Lei
2018-12-17 10:42 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] blk-mq: fix shared queue mapping Ming Lei
2018-12-17 10:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-17 11:06     ` Ming Lei
2018-12-17 10:42 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] blk-mq: fix dispatch from sw queue Ming Lei
2018-12-17 11:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-17 11:15     ` Ming Lei
2018-12-17 11:16       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-12-17 10:42 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] blk-mq: export hctx->type in debugfs instead of sysfs Ming Lei
2018-12-17 10:57   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181217111658.GA6341@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.