All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	broonie@kernel.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com,
	oleksandr@natalenko.name, mancha@tower-research.com,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 11/14] block, bfq: reduce threshold for detecting command queueing
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:06:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190129110638.12652-12-paolo.valente@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129110638.12652-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>

bfq borrowed from cfq a simple heuristic for detecting whether the
drive performs command queueing: check whether the average number of
in-flight requests is above a given threshold. Unfortunately this
heuristic does fail to detect queueing (on drives with queueing) if
processes doing I/O are few and issue I/O with a low depth.

To reduce false negatives, this commit lowers the threshold.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index bf585ad29bb5..48b579032d14 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *bfq_pool;
 #define BFQ_MIN_TT		(2 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
 
 /* hw_tag detection: parallel requests threshold and min samples needed. */
-#define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD	4
+#define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD	3
 #define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES	32
 
 #define BFQQ_SEEK_THR		(sector_t)(8 * 100)
@@ -4798,7 +4798,7 @@ static void bfq_update_hw_tag(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 	 * sum is not exact, as it's not taking into account deactivated
 	 * requests.
 	 */
-	if (bfqd->rq_in_driver + bfqd->queued < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD)
+	if (bfqd->rq_in_driver + bfqd->queued <= BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD)
 		return;
 
 	if (bfqd->hw_tag_samples++ < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES)
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-29 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-29 11:06 [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 00/14] batch of patches for next linux release Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 01/14] block, bfq: do not consider interactive queues in srt filtering Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 02/14] block, bfq: avoid selecting a queue w/o budget Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 03/14] block, bfq: make sure queue budgets are not below service received Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 04/14] block, bfq: remove case of redirected bic from insert_request Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 05/14] block, bfq: consider also ioprio classes in symmetry detection Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 06/14] block, bfq: split function bfq_better_to_idle Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 07/14] block, bfq: do not plug I/O of in-service queue when harmful Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 08/14] block, bfq: unconditionally plug I/O in asymmetric scenarios Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 09/14] block, bfq: fix sequential rq detection in rate estimation Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 10/14] block, bfq: fix queue removal from weights tree Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` Paolo Valente [this message]
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 12/14] block, bfq: port commit "cfq-iosched: improve hw_tag detection" Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 13/14] block, bfq: do not overcharge writes in asymmetric scenarios Paolo Valente
2019-01-29 11:06 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 14/14] block, bfq: fix in-service-queue check for queue merging Paolo Valente
2019-01-31 19:50 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT 00/14] batch of patches for next linux release Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190129110638.12652-12-paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --to=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mancha@tower-research.com \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.