All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: [PATCH 71/97] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:43:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228224356.2608-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228224356.2608-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Add secmark_refcount_dec and secmark_refcount_inc to the
LSM hooks for which only the designated module is called.
This is in support of consistant secmark behavior.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h |  2 ++
 security/security.c       | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index e76e5cd05180..4020e13f0669 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -2029,6 +2029,8 @@ struct lsm_one_hooks {
 	union security_list_options secctx_to_secid;
 	union security_list_options socket_getpeersec_stream;
 	union security_list_options secmark_relabel_packet;
+	union security_list_options secmark_refcount_inc;
+	union security_list_options secmark_refcount_dec;
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 024601db215e..af3f6a89ee88 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -472,6 +472,12 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
 		else if (hooks[i].head ==
 				&security_hook_heads.secmark_relabel_packet)
 			lsm_base_one.secmark_relabel_packet = hooks[i].hook;
+		else if (hooks[i].head ==
+				&security_hook_heads.secmark_refcount_inc)
+			lsm_base_one.secmark_refcount_inc = hooks[i].hook;
+		else if (hooks[i].head ==
+				&security_hook_heads.secmark_refcount_dec)
+			lsm_base_one.secmark_refcount_dec = hooks[i].hook;
 		else
 			continue;
 		if (lsm_base_one.lsm == NULL)
@@ -752,6 +758,14 @@ int lsm_superblock_alloc(struct super_block *sb)
 	RC;							\
 })
 
+#define call_one_void_hook(FUNC, ...) ({			\
+	struct lsm_one_hooks *LOH = current_cred()->security;	\
+	if (LOH->FUNC.FUNC)					\
+		LOH->FUNC.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);			\
+	else if (LOH->lsm == NULL && lsm_base_one.FUNC.FUNC)	\
+		lsm_base_one.FUNC.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);		\
+})
+
 #define call_one_int_hook(FUNC, IRC, ...) ({			\
 	int RC = IRC;						\
 	struct lsm_one_hooks *LOH = current_cred()->security;	\
@@ -2022,6 +2036,8 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
 		union security_list_options secctx_to_secid;
 		union security_list_options socket_getpeersec_stream;
 		union security_list_options secmark_relabel_packet;
+		union security_list_options secmark_refcount_inc;
+		union security_list_options secmark_refcount_dec;
 
 		if (size == 0 || size >= 100)
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -2068,6 +2084,28 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
 				break;
 			}
 		}
+		secmark_refcount_inc.secmark_refcount_inc = NULL;
+		hlist_for_each_entry(hp,
+				&security_hook_heads.secmark_refcount_inc,
+				     list) {
+			if (size >= strlen(hp->lsm) &&
+			    !strncmp(value, hp->lsm, size)) {
+				secmark_refcount_inc = hp->hook;
+				found = true;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		secmark_refcount_dec.secmark_refcount_dec = NULL;
+		hlist_for_each_entry(hp,
+				&security_hook_heads.secmark_refcount_dec,
+				     list) {
+			if (size >= strlen(hp->lsm) &&
+			    !strncmp(value, hp->lsm, size)) {
+				secmark_refcount_dec = hp->hook;
+				found = true;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
 		if (!found)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -2339,13 +2377,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secmark_relabel_packet);
 
 void security_secmark_refcount_inc(void)
 {
-	call_void_hook(secmark_refcount_inc);
+	call_one_void_hook(secmark_refcount_inc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secmark_refcount_inc);
 
 void security_secmark_refcount_dec(void)
 {
-	call_void_hook(secmark_refcount_dec);
+	call_one_void_hook(secmark_refcount_dec);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secmark_refcount_dec);
 
-- 
2.17.0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-28 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 22:43 [PATCH 00/97] LSM: Complete module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 72/97] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list - part 2 Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 73/97] LSM: refactor security_setprocattr Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 74/97] Smack: Detect if secmarks can be safely used Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 75/97] LSM: Support multiple LSMs using inode_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 76/97] LSM: Use full security context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 77/97] LSM: Correct handling of ENOSYS in inode_setxattr Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 78/97] LSM: Infrastructure security blobs for mount options Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 79/97] LSM: Fix for security_init_inode_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 80/97] Smack: Advertise the secid to netlabel Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 81/97] LSM: Change error detection for UDP peer security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 82/97] Smack: Fix setting of the CIPSO MLS_CAT flags Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 83/97] Smack: Set netlabel flags properly on new label import Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 84/97] Netlabel: Add a secattr comparison API function Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 85/97] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on the ambient domain Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 86/97] Smack: Don't set the socket label on each send Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 87/97] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on connections Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 88/97] Netlabel: Return the labeling type on socket Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 89/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 90/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 91/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 92/97] LSM: Remember the NLTYPE of netlabel sockets Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 93/97] Smack: Use the NLTYPE on output Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 94/97] LSM: Hook for netlabel reconciliation Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 95/97] LSM: Avoid network conflicts in SELinux and Smack Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 96/97] LSM: Apply Netlabel consitancy checks on send and connect Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 97/97] Smack: Remove the exclusive bit Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190228224356.2608-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.