From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:37:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605153742.lusoiodrzxmpsrvd@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605144450.GN374014@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
On 05-Jun 07:44, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:39:50PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > Which means we will enforce the effective values as:
> >
> > /tg1/tg11:
> >
> > util_min.effective=0
> > i.e. keep the child protection since smaller than parent
> >
> > util_max.effective=800
> > i.e. keep parent limit since stricter than child
> >
> > Please shout if I got it wrong, otherwise I'll update v10 to
> > implement the above logic.
>
> Everything sounds good to me. Please note that cgroup interface files
> actually use literal "max" for limit/protection max settings so that 0
> and "max" mean the same things for all limit/protection knobs.
Lemme see if I've got it right, do you mean that we can:
1) write the _string_ "max" into a cgroup attribute to:
- set 0 for util_max, since it's a protection
- set 1024 for util_min, since it's a limit
2) write the _string_ "0" into a cgroup attribute to:
- set 1024 for util_max, since it's a protection
- set 0 for util_min, since it's a limit
Is that correct or it's just me totally confused?
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
Cheers,
Patrick
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 9:44 [PATCH v9 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 01/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 02/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add bucket local max tracking Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 05/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Reset uclamp values on RESET_ON_FORK Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 08/16] sched/core: uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and " Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 11/16] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute() Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-31 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-03 12:24 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-03 12:27 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 14:03 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 14:39 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 14:44 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 15:37 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2019-06-05 15:39 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-03 12:29 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 14:09 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 15:06 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 13/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate parent clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 15/16] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 16/16] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-30 10:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190605153742.lusoiodrzxmpsrvd@e110439-lin \
--to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.