All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	jikos@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] module: Fix up module_notifier return values.
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:18:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624092109.805742823@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190624091843.859714294@infradead.org

While auditing all module notifiers I noticed a whole bunch of fail
wrt the return value. Notifiers have a 'special' return semantics.

Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: oprofile-list@lists.sf.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c |    4 ++--
 kernel/module.c                |    9 +++++----
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c       |    8 ++++++--
 kernel/trace/trace.c           |    2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c    |    2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_printk.c    |    4 ++--
 kernel/tracepoint.c            |    2 +-
 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ module_load_notify(struct notifier_block
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
 	if (val != MODULE_STATE_COMING)
-		return 0;
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	/* FIXME: should we process all CPU buffers ? */
 	mutex_lock(&buffer_mutex);
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ module_load_notify(struct notifier_block
 	add_event_entry(MODULE_LOADED_CODE);
 	mutex_unlock(&buffer_mutex);
 #endif
-	return 0;
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
 
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1302,10 +1302,11 @@ static int bpf_event_notify(struct notif
 {
 	struct bpf_trace_module *btm, *tmp;
 	struct module *mod = module;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (mod->num_bpf_raw_events == 0 ||
 	    (op != MODULE_STATE_COMING && op != MODULE_STATE_GOING))
-		return 0;
+		goto out;
 
 	mutex_lock(&bpf_module_mutex);
 
@@ -1315,6 +1316,8 @@ static int bpf_event_notify(struct notif
 		if (btm) {
 			btm->module = module;
 			list_add(&btm->list, &bpf_trace_modules);
+		} else {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
 		}
 		break;
 	case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
@@ -1330,7 +1333,8 @@ static int bpf_event_notify(struct notif
 
 	mutex_unlock(&bpf_module_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+out:
+	return notifier_from_errno(ret);
 }
 
 static struct notifier_block bpf_module_nb = {
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -8685,7 +8685,7 @@ static int trace_module_notify(struct no
 		break;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
 static struct notifier_block trace_module_nb = {
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ static int trace_module_notify(struct no
 	mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
 static struct notifier_block trace_module_nb = {
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int module_trace_bprintk_format_n
 		if (val == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
 			hold_module_trace_bprintk_format(start, end);
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ __init static int
 module_trace_bprintk_format_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 		unsigned long val, void *data)
 {
-	return 0;
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 static inline const char **
 find_next_mod_format(int start_index, void *v, const char **fmt, loff_t *pos)
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static int tracepoint_module_notify(stru
 	case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED:
 		break;
 	}
-	return ret;
+	return notifier_from_errno(ret);
 }
 
 static struct notifier_block tracepoint_module_nb = {



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24  9:18 [PATCH 0/3] Propagate module notifier errors Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-24  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-24 22:21   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-25  7:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-25 12:13       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-25 13:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-24  9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-24 14:01   ` [PATCH 2/3] module: Fix up module_notifier return values Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-06-24 15:52     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-24 17:50       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-06-24 20:58     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2019-06-25  7:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-04 12:48         ` Robert Richter
2019-07-04 12:34   ` Robert Richter
2019-06-24  9:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-24 11:07   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190624092109.805742823@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.