From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH 04/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:39:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190726233923.2570-5-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726233923.2570-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
lsmblob instead of a u32. In some cases this requires a
temporary conversion using lsmblob_init() that will go
away when other interfaces get converted.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/auditfilter.c | 7 +++++--
kernel/auditsc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 4 ++--
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 7 +++++--
security/security.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 5bb8b9a6fa84..4f8b478bc3a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1761,7 +1761,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule);
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void *lsmrule);
void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule);
#else
@@ -1777,8 +1778,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
return 0;
}
-static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
- void *lsmrule)
+static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+ u32 op, void *lsmrule)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 63f8b3f26fab..8786b95b60bd 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1324,6 +1324,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
pid_t pid;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
switch (f->type) {
case AUDIT_PID:
@@ -1354,8 +1355,10 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
if (f->lsm_rule) {
security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
- f->type, f->op, f->lsm_rule);
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(
+ &blob, f->type,
+ f->op, f->lsm_rule);
}
break;
case AUDIT_EXE:
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index d1eab1d4a930..18ee5556c086 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
const struct cred *cred;
int i, need_sid = 1;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
unsigned int sessionid;
cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
@@ -630,7 +631,9 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
need_sid = 0;
}
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
+ f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rule);
}
@@ -645,15 +648,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (f->lsm_rule) {
/* Find files that match */
if (name) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
result = security_audit_rule_match(
- name->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rule);
} else if (ctx) {
list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, n->osid);
if (security_audit_rule_match(
- n->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rule)) {
@@ -665,7 +670,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
/* Find ipc objects that match */
if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
break;
- if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
+ if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
f->type, f->op,
f->lsm_rule))
++result;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d213e835c498..5a337239d9e4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
return -EINVAL;
}
-static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
- void *lsmrule)
+static inline int security_filter_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+ u32 op, void *lsmrule)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e0cc323f948f..e7b8ce942950 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
int rc = 0;
u32 osid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
int retried = 0;
if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
@@ -337,7 +338,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, osid);
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rule);
@@ -345,7 +347,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, secid);
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rule);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 27e2db3d6b04..fa6e425e6f29 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
/*
* Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
*/
-static int lsm_slot __initdata;
+static int lsm_slot __lsm_ro_after_init;
/**
* security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
@@ -2433,9 +2433,21 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule);
}
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule)
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void *lsmrule)
{
- return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule);
+ struct security_hook_list *hp;
+ int rc;
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
+ if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+ continue;
+ rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
+ field, op, lsmrule);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-26 23:38 [PATCH v5 00/27] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:38 ` [PATCH 01/27] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:38 ` [PATCH 02/27] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:38 ` [PATCH 03/27] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 05/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 06/27] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 07/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 08/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 09/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 10/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 11/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 12/27] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 13/27] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 14/27] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-07-29 17:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 15/27] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 16/27] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 17/27] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 18/27] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 19/27] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 20/27] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 21/27] SELinux: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 22/27] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 23/27] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 24/27] LSM: Provide an user space interface for the default display Casey Schaufler
2019-07-29 17:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 25/27] NET: Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2019-07-29 13:00 ` Simon McVittie
2019-07-29 15:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 26/27] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2019-07-29 17:19 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-29 19:22 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-29 21:40 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-26 23:39 ` [PATCH 27/27] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190726233923.2570-5-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.