Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add header include protection macro

From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <JManeyrol@invensense.com>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: add header include protection macro
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:32:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190805173226.71757a05@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190805122513.8399-1-jmaneyrol@invensense.com>

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:25:43 +0000
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <JManeyrol@invensense.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
No problem with adding this,  but why specifically did you do so?

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> index db1c6904388b..e64eb978e810 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
>  /*
>  * Copyright (C) 2012 Invensense, Inc.
>  */
> +
> +#ifndef INV_MPU_IIO_H_
> +#define INV_MPU_IIO_H_
> +
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -342,3 +346,5 @@ void inv_mpu_acpi_delete_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client);
>  int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
>  		int (*inv_mpu_bus_setup)(struct iio_dev *), int chip_type);
>  extern const struct dev_pm_ops inv_mpu_pmops;
> +
> +#endif