From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate hardcoded RIP advancement from vmrun_interception()
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:11:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190813181121.GH13991@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813135335.25197-8-vkuznets@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:53:35PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Just like we do with other intercepts, in vmrun_interception() we should be
> doing kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() and not just RIP += 3. Also, it is
> wrong to increment RIP before nested_svm_vmrun() as it can result in
> kvm_inject_gp().
>
> We can't call kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() after nested_svm_vmrun() so
> move it inside.
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-13 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 13:53 [PATCH v4 0/7] x86: KVM: svm: get rid of hardcoded instructions lengths Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] x86: KVM: svm: don't pretend to advance RIP in case wrmsr_interception() results in #GP Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] x86: kvm: svm: propagate errors from skip_emulated_instruction() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 18:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-14 9:34 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-15 0:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15 9:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] x86: KVM: clear interrupt shadow on EMULTYPE_SKIP Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] x86: KVM: add xsetbv to the emulator Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] x86: KVM: svm: remove hardcoded instruction length from intercepts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate weird goto from vmrun_interception() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate hardcoded RIP advancement " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-13 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-08-14 13:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] x86: KVM: svm: get rid of hardcoded instructions lengths Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190813181121.GH13991@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.