All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PULL 4/9] s390x: STSI tests
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:04:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918120426.20832-5-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190918120426.20832-1-thuth@redhat.com>

From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

For now let's concentrate on the error conditions.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20190826163502.1298-5-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
[thuth: Replaced a "%3" in inline assembly with "%[addr]"]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 s390x/Makefile      |  1 +
 s390x/stsi.c        | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 s390x/unittests.cfg |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 s390x/stsi.c

diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 3453373..76db0bb 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/gs.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/iep.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/cpumodel.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/diag288.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/stsi.elf
 tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
 
 all: directories test_cases test_cases_binary
diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7232cb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/stsi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Store System Information tests
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 IBM Corp
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2.
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+
+static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
+
+static void test_specs(void)
+{
+	report_prefix_push("specification");
+
+	report_prefix_push("inv r0");
+	expect_pgm_int();
+	stsi(pagebuf, 0, 1 << 8, 0);
+	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	report_prefix_push("inv r1");
+	expect_pgm_int();
+	stsi(pagebuf, 1, 0, 1 << 16);
+	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	report_prefix_push("unaligned");
+	expect_pgm_int();
+	stsi(pagebuf + 42, 1, 0, 0);
+	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_priv(void)
+{
+	report_prefix_push("privileged");
+	expect_pgm_int();
+	enter_pstate();
+	stsi(pagebuf, 0, 0, 0);
+	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void *addr)
+{
+	register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = 0;
+	register unsigned long r1 asm("1") = 0;
+	int cc;
+
+	asm volatile("stsi	0(%[addr])\n"
+		     "ipm	%[cc]\n"
+		     "srl	%[cc],28\n"
+		     : "+d" (r0), [cc] "=d" (cc)
+		     : "d" (r1), [addr] "a" (addr)
+		     : "cc", "memory");
+	assert(!cc);
+	return r0 >> 28;
+}
+
+static void test_fc(void)
+{
+	report("invalid fc",  stsi(pagebuf, 7, 0, 0) == 3);
+	report("query fc >= 2",  stsi_get_fc(pagebuf) >= 2);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	report_prefix_push("stsi");
+	test_priv();
+	test_specs();
+	test_fc();
+	return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index 9dd288a..cc79a4e 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -68,3 +68,6 @@ file = cpumodel.elf
 [diag288]
 file = diag288.elf
 extra_params=-device diag288,id=watchdog0 --watchdog-action inject-nmi
+
+[stsi]
+file = stsi.elf
-- 
2.18.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-18 12:04 [kvm-unit-tests PULL 0/9] New s390x kvm-unit-tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 1/9] s390x: Support PSW restart boot Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 2/9] s390x: Diag288 test Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 3/9] s390x: Move stsi to library Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 5/9] s390x: Add diag308 subcode 0 testing Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 6/9] s390x: Move pfmf to lib and make address void Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 7/9] s390x: Storage key library functions now take void ptr addresses Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 8/9] s390x: Bump march to zEC12 Thomas Huth
2019-09-18 12:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 9/9] s390x: Add storage key removal facility Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190918120426.20832-5-thuth@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.