All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PULL 11/17] s390x: Use interrupts in SCLP and add locking
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:37:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190925163714.27519-12-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925163714.27519-1-thuth@redhat.com>

From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

We need to properly implement interrupt handling for SCLP, because on
z/VM and LPAR SCLP calls are not synchronous!

Also with smp CPUs have to compete for sclp. Let's add some locking,
so they execute sclp calls in an orderly fashion and don't compete for
the data buffer.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190920080356.1948-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h |  2 ++
 lib/s390x/interrupt.c     | 12 +++++++--
 lib/s390x/sclp-console.c  |  2 ++
 lib/s390x/sclp.c          | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 lib/s390x/sclp.h          |  3 +++
 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h b/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h
index 013709f..f485e96 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #define _ASMS390X_IRQ_H_
 #include <asm/arch_def.h>
 
+#define EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG	0x2401
+
 void handle_pgm_int(void);
 void handle_ext_int(void);
 void handle_mcck_int(void);
diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
index cf0a794..7832711 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <libcflat.h>
 #include <asm/interrupt.h>
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
+#include <sclp.h>
 
 static bool pgm_int_expected;
 static struct lowcore *lc;
@@ -107,8 +108,15 @@ void handle_pgm_int(void)
 
 void handle_ext_int(void)
 {
-	report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt: at %#lx",
-		     lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
+	if (lc->ext_int_code != EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
+		report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt: at %#lx",
+			     lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
+	} else {
+		lc->ext_old_psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_EXT;
+		lc->sw_int_cr0 &= ~(1UL << 9);
+		sclp_handle_ext();
+		lc->ext_int_code = 0;
+	}
 }
 
 void handle_mcck_int(void)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp-console.c b/lib/s390x/sclp-console.c
index bc01f41..a5ef45f 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp-console.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp-console.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static void sclp_set_write_mask(void)
 {
 	WriteEventMask *sccb = (void *)_sccb;
 
+	sclp_mark_busy();
 	sccb->h.length = sizeof(WriteEventMask);
 	sccb->mask_length = sizeof(unsigned int);
 	sccb->receive_mask = SCLP_EVENT_MASK_MSG_ASCII;
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ void sclp_print(const char *str)
 	int len = strlen(str);
 	WriteEventData *sccb = (void *)_sccb;
 
+	sclp_mark_busy();
 	sccb->h.length = sizeof(WriteEventData) + len;
 	sccb->h.function_code = SCLP_FC_NORMAL_WRITE;
 	sccb->ebh.length = sizeof(EventBufferHeader) + len;
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
index b60f7a4..56fca0c 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/arch_def.h>
 #include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <asm/barrier.h>
+#include <asm/spinlock.h>
 #include "sclp.h"
 #include <alloc_phys.h>
 #include <alloc_page.h>
@@ -25,6 +27,8 @@ static uint64_t max_ram_size;
 static uint64_t ram_size;
 
 char _sccb[PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(4096)));
+static volatile bool sclp_busy;
+static struct spinlock sclp_lock;
 
 static void mem_init(phys_addr_t mem_end)
 {
@@ -41,17 +45,62 @@ static void mem_init(phys_addr_t mem_end)
 	page_alloc_ops_enable();
 }
 
+static void sclp_setup_int(void)
+{
+	uint64_t mask;
+
+	ctl_set_bit(0, 9);
+
+	mask = extract_psw_mask();
+	mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
+	load_psw_mask(mask);
+}
+
+void sclp_handle_ext(void)
+{
+	ctl_clear_bit(0, 9);
+	spin_lock(&sclp_lock);
+	sclp_busy = false;
+	spin_unlock(&sclp_lock);
+}
+
+void sclp_wait_busy(void)
+{
+	while (sclp_busy)
+		mb();
+}
+
+void sclp_mark_busy(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * With multiple CPUs we might need to wait for another CPU's
+	 * request before grabbing the busy indication.
+	 */
+	while (true) {
+		sclp_wait_busy();
+		spin_lock(&sclp_lock);
+		if (!sclp_busy) {
+			sclp_busy = true;
+			spin_unlock(&sclp_lock);
+			return;
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&sclp_lock);
+	}
+}
+
 static void sclp_read_scp_info(ReadInfo *ri, int length)
 {
 	unsigned int commands[] = { SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED,
 				    SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO };
-	int i;
+	int i, cc;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(commands); i++) {
+		sclp_mark_busy();
 		memset(&ri->h, 0, sizeof(ri->h));
 		ri->h.length = length;
 
-		if (sclp_service_call(commands[i], ri))
+		cc = sclp_service_call(commands[i], ri);
+		if (cc)
 			break;
 		if (ri->h.response_code == SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION)
 			return;
@@ -66,12 +115,14 @@ int sclp_service_call(unsigned int command, void *sccb)
 {
 	int cc;
 
+	sclp_setup_int();
 	asm volatile(
 		"       .insn   rre,0xb2200000,%1,%2\n"  /* servc %1,%2 */
 		"       ipm     %0\n"
 		"       srl     %0,28"
 		: "=&d" (cc) : "d" (command), "a" (__pa(sccb))
 		: "cc", "memory");
+	sclp_wait_busy();
 	if (cc == 3)
 		return -1;
 	if (cc == 2)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index 583c4e5..63cf609 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ typedef struct ReadEventData {
 } __attribute__((packed)) ReadEventData;
 
 extern char _sccb[];
+void sclp_handle_ext(void);
+void sclp_wait_busy(void);
+void sclp_mark_busy(void);
 void sclp_console_setup(void);
 void sclp_print(const char *str);
 int sclp_service_call(unsigned int command, void *sccb);
-- 
2.18.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-25 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-25 16:36 [kvm-unit-tests PULL 00/17] New s390x kvm-unit-tests and some fixes Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 01/17] s390x: Support PSW restart boot Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 02/17] s390x: Diag288 test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 03/17] s390x: Move stsi to library Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 04/17] s390x: STSI tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 05/17] s390x: Add diag308 subcode 0 testing Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 06/17] s390x: Move pfmf to lib and make address void Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 07/17] s390x: Storage key library functions now take void ptr addresses Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 08/17] s390x: Bump march to zEC12 Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 09/17] s390x: Add storage key removal facility Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 10/17] s390x: Fix stsi unaligned test and add selector tests Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 12/17] s390x: Add linemode console Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 13/17] s390x: Add linemode buffer to fix newline on every print Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 14/17] s390x: Add initial smp code Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 15/17] s390x: Prepare for external calls Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 16/17] s390x: SMP test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 17/17] s390x: Free allocated page in iep test Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 16:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PULL 00/17] New s390x kvm-unit-tests and some fixes Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190925163714.27519-12-thuth@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.