All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] RDMA/ucma: Reduce the number of rdma_destroy_id() calls
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:07:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191001150730.GD22532@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190930231707.48259-2-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:16:53PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Instead of calling rdma_destroy_id() after waiting for the context completion
> finished, call rdma_destroy_id() from inside the ucma_put_ctx() function.
> This patch reduces the number of rdma_destroy_id() calls but does not change
> the behavior of this code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
>  drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
> index 0274e9b704be..30c09864fd9e 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
> @@ -160,8 +160,14 @@ static struct ucma_context *ucma_get_ctx(struct ucma_file *file, int id)
>  
>  static void ucma_put_ctx(struct ucma_context *ctx)
>  {
> -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->ref))
> -		complete(&ctx->comp);
> +	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->ref))
> +		return;
> +	/*
> +	 * rdma_destroy_id() ensures that no event handlers are inflight
> +	 * for that id before releasing it.
> +	 */
> +	rdma_destroy_id(ctx->cm_id);
> +	complete(&ctx->comp);
>  }

Since all the refcounting here is basically insane, you can't do this
without creating new kinds of bugs related to lifetime of ctx->cm_id

The call to rdma_destroy_id must be after the xa_erase as other
threads can continue to access the context despite its zero ref via
ucma_get_ctx(() as ucma_get_ctx() is not using refcounts properly.

The xa_erase provides the needed barrier.

Maybe this patch could be fixed if the ucma_get_ctx used an
atomic_inc_not_zero ?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-01 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-30 23:16 [PATCH 00/15] RDMA patches for kernel v5.5 Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 01/15] RDMA/ucma: Reduce the number of rdma_destroy_id() calls Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 15:07   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-01 17:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 02/15] RDMA/iwcm: Fix a lock inversion issue Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 15:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 03/15] RDMA/siw: Simplify several debug messages Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 15:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 04/15] RDMA/siw: Fix port number endianness in a debug message Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 15:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 05/15] RDMA/siw: Make node GUIDs valid EUI-64 identifiers Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 06/15] RDMA/srp: Remove two casts Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 07/15] RDMA/srp: Honor the max_send_sge device attribute Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 08/15] RDMA/srp: Make route resolving error messages more informative Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 09/15] RDMA/srpt: Fix handling of SR-IOV and iWARP ports Bart Van Assche
2019-10-02 14:14   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 15:21     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-02 16:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 17:24         ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-02 17:43           ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-03  8:33             ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 10/15] RDMA/srpt: Fix handling of iWARP logins Bart Van Assche
2019-10-02 14:16   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 15:23     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/srpt: Improve a debug message Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 12/15] RDMA/srpt: Rework the approach for closing an RDMA channel Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 13/15] RDMA/srpt: Rework the code that waits until an RDMA port is no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 14/15] RDMA/srpt: Make the code for handling port identities more systematic Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 15/15] RDMA/srpt: Postpone HCA removal until after configfs directory removal Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 11:39 ` [PATCH 03/15] RDMA/siw: Simplify several debug messages Bernard Metzler
2019-10-01 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/15] RDMA/siw: Fix port number endianness in a debug message Bernard Metzler
2019-10-04 18:36 ` [PATCH 00/15] RDMA patches for kernel v5.5 Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191001150730.GD22532@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.