From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, yhs@fb.com,
davem@davemloft.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/15] samples/bpf: use own flags but not HOSTCFLAGS
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 00:26:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191012212643.GC3689@khorivan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fb88a06-5253-1e48-9bea-2d31a443250b@cogentembedded.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:16:05PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>On 10/11/2019 12:57 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>
>>>> While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to
>>>> ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it
>>>> should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm,
>>>
>>> While verifying.
>> While verification stage.
>
> While *in* verification stage, "while" doesn't combine with nouns w/o
>a preposition.
Sergei, better add me in cc list when msg is to me I can miss it.
Regarding the language lesson, thanks, I will keep it in mind next
time, but the issue is not rude, if it's an issue at all, so I better
leave it as is, as not reasons to correct it w/o code changes and
everyone is able to understand it.
>
>>>> arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always:
>>>>
>>>> -Wall -O2
>>>> -fomit-frame-pointer
>>>> -Wmissing-prototypes
>>>> -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>>
>>>> So, add them as they were verified and used before adding
>>>> Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were proposed
>>>> while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
>>> [...]
>
>MBR, Sergei
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-12 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 0:27 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/15] samples: bpf: improve/fix cross-compilation Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 01/15] samples/bpf: fix HDR_PROBE "echo" Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 02/15] samples/bpf: fix cookie_uid_helper_example obj build Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/15] samples/bpf: use --target from cross-compile Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 04/15] samples/bpf: use own EXTRA_CFLAGS for clang commands Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 05/15] samples/bpf: use __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ selector for arm Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 8:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-11 9:56 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 06/15] samples/bpf: drop unnecessarily inclusion for bpf_load Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 07/15] samples/bpf: add makefile.target for separate CC target build Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 08/15] samples/bpf: base target programs rules on Makefile.target Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/15] samples/bpf: use own flags but not HOSTCFLAGS Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 8:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-11 9:57 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 11:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-12 21:26 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk [this message]
2019-10-13 17:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/15] samples/bpf: use target CC environment for HDR_PROBE Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/15] libbpf: don't use cxx to test_libpf target Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-11-21 21:42 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-11-22 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-11-22 16:32 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-11-22 23:47 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-11-23 0:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 12/15] libbpf: add C/LDFLAGS to libbpf.so and test_libpf targets Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-12 16:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 13/15] samples/bpf: provide C/LDFLAGS to libbpf Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 14/15] samples/bpf: add sysroot support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 15/15] samples/bpf: add preparation steps and sysroot info to readme Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/15] samples: bpf: improve/fix cross-compilation Ilias Apalodimas
2019-10-12 23:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191012212643.GC3689@khorivan \
--to=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.